Suppr超能文献

私密自我、集体自我和异己中心自我中的性别比较。

Gender comparisons in the private, collective, and allocentric selves.

作者信息

Madson L, Trafimow D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003, USA.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 2001 Aug;141(4):551-9. doi: 10.1080/00224540109600571.

Abstract

Researchers (e.g., M. B. Brewer & W. Gardner, 1996; H. C. Triandis, D. K. S. Chan, D. P. S. Bhawuk, S. Iwao, & J. P. B. Sinha, 1995) have suggested expansion of the standard model of individualism-collectivism to include people's close personal relationships in addition to their identification with in-groups. There has been considerable discussion of the hypothesis that women are more collective, interdependent, relational, and allocentric than men (e.g., S. E. Cross & L. Madson, 1997; Y. Kashima et al., 1995). In the present study, the authors used the Twenty Statements Test (M. H. Kuhn & T. McPartland, 1954) to examine gender differences in the self-concept by assessing the accessibility of private, collective, and allocentric self-cognitions. The U.S. women described themselves with more allocentric and more collective self-cognitions than did the U.S. men. Discussion focuses on the implications of those data for interpretation of other gender differences as well as for traditional models of individualism-collectivism.

摘要

研究人员(如M. B. 布鲁尔和W. 加德纳,1996年;H. C. 特里安德斯、D. K. S. 陈、D. P. S. 巴武克、S. 岩尾和J. P. B. 辛哈,1995年)建议扩展个人主义—集体主义的标准模型,使其除了涵盖人们对群体的认同外,还包括人们亲密的个人关系。关于女性比男性更具集体性、相互依存性、关系导向性和他人导向性这一假设,已经有了大量讨论(如S. E. 克罗斯和L. 马德森,1997年;Y. Kashima等人,1995年)。在本研究中,作者使用了二十陈述测验(M. H. 库恩和T. 麦克帕特兰,1954年),通过评估私密自我认知、集体自我认知和他人导向自我认知的可及性,来检验自我概念中的性别差异。与美国男性相比,美国女性在描述自己时使用了更多他人导向和集体自我认知。讨论聚焦于这些数据对解释其他性别差异以及对个人主义—集体主义传统模型的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验