Jun-Shi C
Institute of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Chinese Academy of Preventive Medicine, Beijing.
Biomed Environ Sci. 2001 Jun;14(1-2):145-8.
The key principle in the development of Codex standards is to ensure that the decision-making process is based on sound science. The approval for the use of food additives and other chemicals in foods should be made only when adequate scientific data is available. The same principle applies to the development of maximum tolerable (or residue) levels for contaminants in foods. Using the General Standards for Contaminants and Toxins in Foods as an example, the following criteria are considered, when developing recommendations and standards: Toxicological information; Analytical data; Intake data; Fair trade considerations; Technological considerations; and Risk assessment and risk management considerations. The Codex Alimentarius Commission has repeatedly emphasized the use of risk analysis approach, in particular the use of risk assessment in conducting the safety evaluation of food additives agricultural and veterinary chemicals and environmental and industrial contaminants in foods. In this respect, the well known efforts of the FAO/WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) and the FAD/WHO Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (JMPR) provide the much needed information and recommendations for the risk assessment of specific chemicals. The risk assessment approach is also used in the safety evaluation of foods derived from modern biotechnology as well as in the quantitative assessment of microbiological risks in foods.
食品法典标准制定的关键原则是确保决策过程基于可靠的科学依据。只有在有充分科学数据的情况下,才应批准在食品中使用食品添加剂和其他化学品。同样的原则也适用于食品中污染物最大耐受(或残留)水平的制定。以《食品中污染物和毒素通用标准》为例,在制定建议和标准时会考虑以下标准:毒理学信息;分析数据;摄入量数据;公平贸易考量;技术考量;以及风险评估和风险管理考量。食品法典委员会一再强调使用风险分析方法,特别是在对食品添加剂、农用和兽用化学品以及食品中的环境和工业污染物进行安全评估时使用风险评估。在这方面,粮农组织/世卫组织食品添加剂联合专家委员会(JECFA)和粮农组织/世卫组织农药残留联席会议(JMPR)的著名工作为特定化学品的风险评估提供了急需的信息和建议。风险评估方法也用于现代生物技术衍生食品的安全评估以及食品中微生物风险的定量评估。