Petrovskii S, Li B L
Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Nakhimovsky Prosp. 36, Moscow, 117218, Russia.
J Theor Biol. 2001 Oct 21;212(4):549-62. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2393.
Destruction and fragmentation of habitats is widely considered as a major threat to biological diversity. A theoretical framework aimed at understanding and predicting species responses to these destructive processes is still lacking, however. In this paper, the species dynamics in a spatially structured, two-habitat, patchy environment is considered subject to changes in individual migration intensity, i.e. coupling between the habitats. The subpopulation dynamics inside each habitat is assumed to be bistable but with different parameter values. By using space-discrete/continuous metapopulation dynamic models and computer simulations, we show that there can be two principally different regimes of metapopulation dynamics. With increasing intensity in the interplay between subpopulations, the total abundance can either gradually decrease or experience a sudden burst-like increase. This result is shown to be robust to the choice of mathematical models (discrete or continuous). Particularly, both the "self-excitation" and "self-inhibition" regimes of the metapopulation system are robust to variation in habitat size; however, when one of the habitats is much smaller than the other, the "self-excitation" regime can give way to the "self-inhibition" regime and vice versa.
栖息地的破坏和碎片化被广泛认为是对生物多样性的主要威胁。然而,目前仍缺乏一个旨在理解和预测物种对这些破坏过程反应的理论框架。在本文中,我们考虑了一个空间结构化、双栖息地、斑块状环境中的物种动态,该动态受到个体迁移强度变化的影响,即栖息地之间的耦合。假设每个栖息地内的亚种群动态是双稳态的,但参数值不同。通过使用空间离散/连续集合种群动态模型和计算机模拟,我们表明集合种群动态可能存在两种本质上不同的模式。随着亚种群之间相互作用强度的增加,总丰度可能会逐渐下降,也可能会经历突然的爆发式增长。结果表明,这一结果对于数学模型(离散或连续)的选择具有鲁棒性。特别是,集合种群系统的“自我激发”和“自我抑制”模式对于栖息地大小的变化都具有鲁棒性;然而,当其中一个栖息地比另一个小得多时,“自我激发”模式可能会让位于“自我抑制”模式,反之亦然。