Weinmann W, Stoertzel M, Vogt S, Svoboda M, Schreiber A
Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospital, Albert Ludwigs University Freiburg, Albertstrasse 9, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
J Mass Spectrom. 2001 Sep;36(9):1013-23. doi: 10.1002/jms.201.
Tuning compounds for positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) were tested for the tuning of in-source collision-induced dissociation (ESI/CID) with three types of SCIEX API instruments (API 365, 2000 and 3000) in the single-quadrupole mode. The vacuum interfaces of these instruments differ slightly in geometry, but the principles of ionization and solvent evaporation by nebulizer and curtain gases, orifice and skimmer are identical. For comparison of in-source CID, breakdown curves of haloperidol, paracetamol, metronidazole and metamizole were acquired by increasing the orifice voltages. The API 2000 and 3000 required higher orifice voltages than did the API 365 to induce a similar degree of fragmentation of the protonated or deprotonated molecules to characteristic fragment ions. This increase of orifice voltage could be demonstrated with each of the four compounds tested by a shift of the maxima of the breakdown curves to higher orifice voltages. A procedure with three collision energy (CE) levels for drug identification with a mass spectra library set up with an API 365 therefore required an adjustment of the orifice voltages to higher values when being transferred to an API 2000 or API 3000. The corresponding orifice voltages for the three instruments were 20/50/80 V (API 365), 30/90/130 V (API 2000) and 40/80/120 V (API 3000). However, a change in orifice voltage of +/-10 V (with the API 2000 and 3000) hardly influenced the fit values of a library search for each single CE level. For adjusting orifice voltages with different instruments, a tuning procedure with haloperidol and paracetamol is presented. With this tuning procedure an ESI/CID mass spectra library set up for API 365 and API 150 could also be used for drug identification with an API 2000 and an API 3000 with good library search results.
针对正、负电喷雾电离(ESI)对化合物进行的调谐,在单四极杆模式下,使用三种SCIEX API仪器(API 365、2000和3000)对源内碰撞诱导解离(ESI/CID)进行了调谐测试。这些仪器的真空接口在几何形状上略有不同,但通过雾化器和帘气、孔板和分离器进行电离和溶剂蒸发的原理是相同的。为了比较源内CID,通过增加孔板电压获取了氟哌啶醇、对乙酰氨基酚、甲硝唑和安乃近的击穿曲线。与API 365相比,API 2000和3000需要更高的孔板电压,才能使质子化或去质子化分子裂解为特征性碎片离子的程度相似。通过将击穿曲线的最大值向更高的孔板电压偏移,可以证明所测试的四种化合物中的每一种都会出现这种孔板电压的增加。因此,当将使用API 365建立的具有三个碰撞能量(CE)水平的药物鉴定程序转移到API 2000或API 3000时,需要将孔板电压调整到更高的值。这三种仪器对应的孔板电压分别为20/50/80 V(API 365)、30/90/130 V(API 2000)和40/80/120 V(API 3000)。然而,(对于API 2000和3000)孔板电压±10 V的变化几乎不会影响每个单一CE水平的库检索拟合值。为了用不同仪器调整孔板电压,本文介绍了一种使用氟哌啶醇和对乙酰氨基酚的调谐程序。通过这种调谐程序,为API 365和API 150建立的ESI/CID质谱库也可用于API 2000和API 3000的药物鉴定,且库检索结果良好。