Suppr超能文献

从桡动脉压力波形估计升主动脉压力方法的前瞻性评估。

Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform.

作者信息

Pauca A L, O'Rourke M F, Kon N D

机构信息

Anesthesiology Departmen, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2001 Oct;38(4):932-7. doi: 10.1161/hy1001.096106.

Abstract

Pressure wave reflection in the upper limb causes amplification of the arterial pulse so that radial systolic and pulse pressures are greater than in the ascending aorta. Wave transmission properties in the upper limbs (in contrast to the descending aorta and lower limbs) change little with age, disease, and drug therapy in adult humans. Such consistency has led to use of a generalized transfer function to synthesize the ascending aortic pressure pulse from the radial pulse. Validity of this approach was tested for estimation of aortic systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean pressures from the radial pressure waveform. Ascending aortic and radial pressure waveforms were recorded simultaneously at cardiac surgery, before initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, with matched, fluid-filled manometer systems in 62 patients under control conditions and during nitroglycerin infusion. Aortic pressure pulse waves, generated from the radial pulse, showed agreement with the measured aortic pulse waves with respect to systolic, diastolic, pulse, and mean pressures, with mean differences <1 mm Hg. Control differences in Bland-Altman plots for mean+/-SD in mm Hg were systolic, 0.0+/-4.4; diastolic, 0.6+/-1.7; pulse, -0.7+/-4.2; and mean pressure, -0.5+/-2.0. For nitroglycerin infusion, differences respectively were systolic, -0.2+/-4.3; diastolic, 0.6+/-1.7; pulse, -0.8+/-4.1; and mean pressure, -0.4+/-1.8. Differences were within specified limits of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation SP10 criteria. In contrast, differences between recorded radial and aortic systolic and pulse pressures were well outside the criteria (respectively, 15.7+/-8.4 and 16.3+/-8.5 for control and 14.5+/-7.3 and 15.1+/-7.3 mm Hg for nitroglycerin). Use of a generalized transfer function to synthesize radial artery pressure waveforms can provide substantially equivalent values of aortic systolic, pulse, mean, and diastolic pressures.

摘要

上肢的压力波反射会导致动脉脉搏放大,从而使桡动脉收缩压和脉压高于升主动脉。在成年人体内,上肢的波传播特性(与降主动脉和下肢不同)随年龄、疾病和药物治疗的变化很小。这种一致性使得人们使用广义传递函数从桡动脉脉搏合成升主动脉压力脉搏。对该方法从桡动脉压力波形估计主动脉收缩压、舒张压、脉压和平均压的有效性进行了测试。在心脏手术中,在体外循环开始前,使用匹配的充液压力计系统,在62例患者的对照条件下和硝酸甘油输注期间,同时记录升主动脉和桡动脉压力波形。从桡动脉脉搏生成的主动脉压力脉搏波在收缩压、舒张压、脉压和平均压方面与测量的主动脉脉搏波一致,平均差异<1 mmHg。Bland-Altman图中对照条件下平均±标准差(mmHg)的差异为:收缩压,0.0±4.4;舒张压,0.6±1.7;脉压,-0.7±4.2;平均压,-0.5±2.0。对于硝酸甘油输注,差异分别为:收缩压,-0.2±4.3;舒张压,0.6±1.7;脉压,-0.8±4.1;平均压,-0.4±1.8。差异在医疗仪器促进协会SP10标准的规定范围内。相比之下,记录的桡动脉和主动脉收缩压及脉压之间的差异远超出标准(对照条件下分别为15.7±8.4和16.3±8.5,硝酸甘油输注时为14.5±7.3和15.1±7.3 mmHg)。使用广义传递函数合成桡动脉压力波形可以提供基本等效的主动脉收缩压、脉压、平均压和舒张压值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验