Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence.
作者信息
Knapp Thomas A, Huff Richard L
出版信息
J Leg Med (N Y). 1975 Jan;3(1):31-5.
PMID:11643353
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence.
J Leg Med (N Y). 1975 Jan;3(1):31-5.
2
Emerging trends in the physician's duty to disclose: an update of Canterbury v. Spence.
J Leg Med (N Y). 1975 Jan;3(1):41-5.
3
Rogers v. Whitaker and informed consent in Australia: a fair dinkum duty of disclosure.
Med Law Rev. 1993 Summer;1(2):139-59. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/1.2.139.
4
Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments.
Forum. 1976 Spring;11(3):716-26.
5
Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two.
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1985 Mar;18(2):125-30.
6
Who's afraid of whom? Courts require HIV-infected doctors to obtain informed consent of patients.
De Paul Law Rev. 1995 Winter;44(2):483-511.
7
Physicians with AIDS: a proposal for efficient disclosure.
Univ Chic Law Rev. 1992 Spring;59(2):749-78.
8
Duty to warn; negligence; AIDS/HIV; surgeon: Doe v. Noe.
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep. 1998 Mar-Apr;22(2):250.
9
The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
LA Law Rev. 1983 Sep;45(1):1-38.
10
Informed consent: from disclosure to patient participation in medical decisionmaking.
Northwest Univ Law Rev. 1981 Mar;76(1):172-207.
Zotero 插件