Babis G C, Trousdale R T, Pagnano M W, Morrey B F
Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Oct;83(10):1534-6. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00012.
Severe stiffness after total knee arthroplasty is a debilitating problem. In patients with securely fixed and appropriately aligned components, arthrolysis of adhesions and exchange to a thinner tibial polyethylene insert may appear to be a reasonable and logical solution. We reviewed our experience with this procedure to determine its efficacy.
From 1992 through 1998, seven knees with marked stiffness after total knee arthroplasty were treated at our institution with arthrolysis of adhesions and conversion to a thinner tibial polyethylene insert. Only patients in whom the total knee prosthesis was well aligned, well fixed, and not associated with infection were included. There were five women and two men with a mean age at revision of sixty-one years (range, thirty-eight to seventy-four years). The average time to revision was twelve months, and the mean arc of motion prior to revision was 38.6 degrees (range, 15 degrees to 60 degrees ). The duration of follow-up after the insert exchange averaged 4.2 years (range, two to eight years).
Mean Knee Society pain and function scores changed from 44 and 36.4 points preoperatively to 39.6 and 46 points at the time of final follow-up. Two knees were rerevised, one because of infection and the other because of aseptic loosening of the components. The five remaining knees were painful and stiff at the time of final follow-up. Four of these five knees were severely painful, and one knee was moderately and occasionally painful. The mean arc of motion of these five knees was 58 degrees (range, 40 degrees to 70 degrees ) at the time of final follow-up.
Isolated tibial insert exchange, arthrolysis, and débridement failed to provide a viable solution to the difficult and poorly understood problem of knee stiffness in a group of carefully selected patients following total knee arthroplasty. We therefore have little enthusiasm for the continued use of this strategy.
全膝关节置换术后严重僵硬是一个使人衰弱的问题。对于假体固定牢固且排列合适的患者,粘连松解及更换为更薄的胫骨聚乙烯衬垫似乎是一种合理且符合逻辑的解决方法。我们回顾了我们采用该手术方法的经验以确定其疗效。
1992年至1998年期间,我们机构对7例全膝关节置换术后出现明显僵硬的膝关节进行了粘连松解并更换为更薄的胫骨聚乙烯衬垫的治疗。仅纳入全膝关节假体排列良好、固定良好且无感染的患者。有5名女性和2名男性,翻修时的平均年龄为61岁(范围为38至74岁)。翻修的平均时间为12个月,翻修前的平均活动弧度为38.6度(范围为15度至60度)。衬垫更换后的平均随访时间为4.2年(范围为2至8年)。
膝关节协会的平均疼痛和功能评分从术前的44分和36.4分分别变为末次随访时的39.6分和46分。2例膝关节再次翻修,1例因感染,另1例因假体无菌性松动。其余5例膝关节在末次随访时仍疼痛且僵硬。这5例膝关节中有4例疼痛严重,1例膝关节中度且偶尔疼痛。这5例膝关节在末次随访时的平均活动弧度为58度(范围为40度至70度)。
在一组精心挑选的全膝关节置换术后患者中,单纯的胫骨衬垫更换、粘连松解及清创术未能为膝关节僵硬这一棘手且了解甚少的问题提供可行的解决方案。因此,我们对继续使用该策略热情不高。