Biagini R E, Krieg E F, Pinkerton L E, Hamilton R G
Division of Applied Research and Technology, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service, Department of Health and Human Services, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2001 Nov;8(6):1145-9. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.6.1145-1149.2001.
Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of Food and Drug Administration (510K)-cleared natural rubber latex (NRL)-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody immunoassays have not been performed using well-characterized skin-testing reagents. Sera were collected from 311 subjects (131 latex puncture skin test [PST] positive and 180 PST negative). All masked, coded sera were analyzed for latex-specific IgE antibodies in the Diagnostic Products Corporation microplate AlaSTAT, HYCOR HY-TEC RAST, and Pharmacia-Upjohn CAP System RAST FEIA (CAP). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using GraphRoc for Windows software to construct and analyze ROC curves in relation to the subjects' PST status and the results of the immunoassays. The ROC areas under the curve (AUCs) +/- standard error based on PST for the three diagnostic tests were 0.858 +/- 0.024, 0.869 +/- 0.024, and 0.924 +/- 0.017, respectively, for AlaSTAT, CAP, and HY-TEC. The HY-TEC system had a significantly greater AUC based on PST than those observed for AlaSTAT (P < 0.05) and CAP (P < 0.05) analyses. When the diagnostic tests were probed as to the cutoffs giving maximal diagnostic efficiency compared to PST, CAP and AlaSTAT yielded values of <0.35 kU of allergen IgE (kU(A))/liter and <0.35 kU/liter while the HY-TEC assay yielded 0.11 kU/liter. The diagnostic efficiencies based on PST in our cohort at these cutoffs were 87.1, 88.1, and 88.7%, respectively. The HY-TEC assay had a significantly greater AUC than CAP and AlaSTAT using PST as a diagnostic discriminator in our cohort. When the HY-TEC system was probed at its maximally efficient cutoff (0.11 kU/liter) versus HYCOR's recommended cutoff of 0.05 kU/liter, a loss of sensitivity of 8.4% was observed with a gain in specificity of 19.5%.
尚未使用特征明确的皮肤测试试剂进行接受者操作特征(ROC)分析,以评估和比较美国食品药品监督管理局(510K)批准的天然橡胶乳胶(NRL)特异性免疫球蛋白E(IgE)抗体免疫测定的诊断准确性。从311名受试者中收集血清(131名乳胶点刺皮肤试验[PST]阳性和180名PST阴性)。所有经过屏蔽、编码的血清在诊断产品公司的微孔板AlaSTAT、HYCOR HY-TEC RAST和法玛西亚-普强公司的CAP系统RAST FEIA(CAP)中进行乳胶特异性IgE抗体分析。使用适用于Windows的GraphRoc软件评估诊断准确性,以构建和分析与受试者PST状态及免疫测定结果相关的ROC曲线。基于PST的三项诊断测试的曲线下ROC面积(AUC)±标准误差,AlaSTAT、CAP和HY-TEC分别为0.858±0.024、0.869±0.024和0.924±0.017。基于PST的HY-TEC系统的AUC显著大于AlaSTAT(P<0.05)和CAP(P<0.05)分析中的观察值。当探究诊断测试与PST相比给出最大诊断效率的临界值时,CAP和AlaSTAT得出的值<0.35 kU过敏原IgE(kU(A))/升和<0.35 kU/升,而HY-TEC测定得出的值为0.11 kU/升。在这些临界值下,基于我们队列中PST的诊断效率分别为87.1%、88.1%和88.7%。在我们的队列中,使用PST作为诊断鉴别指标时,HY-TEC测定的AUC显著大于CAP和AlaSTAT。当探究HY-TEC系统在其最大效率临界值(0.11 kU/升)与HYCOR推荐的临界值0.05 kU/升时,观察到敏感性损失8.4%,特异性增加19.5%。