Burkhart S S, Danaceau S M, Pearce C E
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arthroscopy. 2001 Nov-Dec;17(9):905-12. doi: 10.1053/jars.2001.26821.
The purpose of this article is 2-fold: To report the long-term functional results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 3.5 years in this study), and to analyze results by tear size and repair technique (margin convergence v direct tendon-to-bone repair).
Case series.
Between September 1993 and April 1997, 62 patients had an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair performed by the senior author (S.S.B.). Of this group, 59 patients (59 shoulders) were available for follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative function were assessed by means of a modified UCLA scoring system. Tears were categorized according to size (greatest diameter, number of tendons involved, and pattern of tear [crescent shape v U-shape]). Crescent-shaped tears were repaired in a direct tendon-to-bone fashion and U-shaped tears were repaired by a margin-convergence technique.
Good and excellent results were achieved in 95% of the cases, regardless of tear size. The large and massive tears did as well as the small and medium-sized tears. That is, results were independent of tear size (P >.05). Results of tears repaired by margin convergence were not significantly different statistically from those repaired by direct tendon-to-bone repair (P >.05), validating the selection criteria of U-shaped tears for repair by margin convergence. There is a rapid return to full overhead function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 4 months for each tear size). Delay from injury to surgery, even of several years, did not adversely affect surgical outcome.
(1) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair can achieve good and excellent results in a large percentage of patients (95% in this series). (2) Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are independent of tear size. (3) U-shaped tears repaired by margin convergence have results comparable to those of crescent-shaped tears repaired directly by a tendon-to-bone technique. (4) There is a rapid return to full overhead function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (average, 4 months for all tear sizes). (5) A delay from injury to diagnosis, even of several years, is not a contraindication to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
本文目的有两个:报告关节镜下肩袖修补术的长期功能结果(本研究平均为3.5年),并按撕裂大小和修补技术(边缘对合与直接肌腱-骨修补)分析结果。
病例系列。
1993年9月至1997年4月期间,62例患者接受了由资深作者(S.S.B.)实施的关节镜下肩袖修补术。该组中,59例患者(59个肩关节)可供随访。术前和术后功能通过改良的加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分系统进行评估。根据撕裂大小(最大直径、累及的肌腱数量和撕裂模式[新月形与U形])对撕裂进行分类。新月形撕裂采用直接肌腱-骨方式修补,U形撕裂采用边缘对合技术修补。
95%的病例取得了良好和优异的结果,与撕裂大小无关。大的和巨大的撕裂与小的和中等大小的撕裂效果相同。也就是说,结果与撕裂大小无关(P>.05)。边缘对合修补的撕裂结果与直接肌腱-骨修补的结果在统计学上无显著差异(P>.05),验证了U形撕裂采用边缘对合修补的选择标准。关节镜下肩袖修补术后能迅速恢复完全上举功能(每种撕裂大小平均4个月)。从受伤到手术的延迟,即使数年,也未对手术结果产生不利影响。
(1)关节镜下肩袖修补术能在很大比例的患者中取得良好和优异的结果(本系列中为95%)。(2)关节镜下肩袖修补术的结果与撕裂大小无关。(3)采用边缘对合修补的U形撕裂结果与采用肌腱-骨技术直接修补的新月形撕裂结果相当。(4)关节镜下肩袖修补术后能迅速恢复完全上举功能(所有撕裂大小平均4个月)。(5)从受伤到诊断的延迟,即使数年,也不是关节镜下肩袖修补术的禁忌证。