Foda H M
Otolaryngology Department, Alexandrai School of Medicine, Alexandria, Egypt.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001 Nov;127(11):1341-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.127.11.1341.
To describe an alar cartilage-modifying technique aimed at decreasing nasal tip projection in cases with overdeveloped alar cartilages and to compare it with other deprojection techniques used to correct such deformity.
Selected case series.
University and private practice settings in Alexandria, Egypt.
Twenty patients presenting for rhinoplasty who had overprojected nasal tips primarily due to overdeveloped alar cartilages. All cases were primary cases except for one patient, who had undergone 2 previous rhinoplasties.
An external rhinoplasty approach was used to set back the alar cartilages by shortening their medial and lateral crura. The choice of performing a high or low setback depended on the preexisting lobule-to-columella ratio. Following the setback, the alar cartilages were reconstructed in a fashion that increased the strength and stability of the tip complex.
Subjective evaluation included clinical examination, analysis of preoperative and postoperative photographs, and patient satisfaction. Objective evaluation of nasal tip projection, using the Goode ratio and the nasofacial angle, was performed preoperatively and repeated at least 6 months postoperatively.
A low setback was performed in 16 cases (80%) and a high setback in 4 (20%). The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range, 6-36 months). The technique effectively deprojected the nasal tip as evidenced by the considerable postoperative decrease in values of the Goode ratio and the nasofacial angle. No complications were encountered and no revision surgical procedures were required.
The alar setback technique has many advantages; it results in precise predictable amounts of deprojection, controls the degree of tip rotation, preserves the natural contour of the nasal tip, respects the tip support mechanisms, increases the strength and stability of nasal tip complex, preserves or restores the normal lobule-to-columella proportion, and does not lead to alar flaring. However, the technique requires an external rhinoplasty approach and fine technical precision.
描述一种针对鼻翼软骨过度发育导致鼻尖突出的病例而设计的鼻翼软骨矫正技术,并将其与用于矫正此类畸形的其他鼻尖降低技术进行比较。
选定病例系列。
埃及亚历山大的大学及私人诊所。
20例因鼻翼软骨过度发育导致鼻尖突出前来接受隆鼻手术的患者。除1例曾接受过2次隆鼻手术外,其余均为初次手术病例。
采用鼻外入路,通过缩短鼻翼软骨的内侧脚和外侧脚来降低鼻翼软骨位置。进行高位或低位降低的选择取决于术前小叶与鼻小柱的比例。降低鼻翼软骨位置后,以增加鼻尖复合体强度和稳定性的方式对鼻翼软骨进行重建。
主观评估包括临床检查、术前和术后照片分析以及患者满意度。术前使用古德比例(Goode ratio)和鼻面角对鼻尖突出度进行客观评估,并在术后至少6个月重复评估。
16例(80%)进行了低位降低,4例(20%)进行了高位降低。平均随访期为18个月(范围6 - 36个月)。该技术有效降低了鼻尖突出度,古德比例和鼻面角的值在术后显著下降即证明了这一点。未出现并发症,也无需进行修复手术。
鼻翼软骨降低技术有诸多优点;它能精确、可预测地降低鼻尖高度,控制鼻尖旋转程度,保留鼻尖自然轮廓,尊重鼻尖支撑机制,增加鼻尖复合体的强度和稳定性,保持或恢复正常的小叶与鼻小柱比例,且不会导致鼻翼外扩。然而,该技术需要采用鼻外入路且技术精度要求高。