Heck F C, Williams J D, Crawford R P, Flowers A I
J Hyg (Lond). 1979 Dec;83(3):491-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022172400026334.
A total of 4551 sera from 863 Strain 19 vaccinated and non-vaccinated adult cattle, independent of disease status, were tested by five serological methods to detect the presence of antibodies to B. abortus. Results from Standard Agglutination Tube (SAT), Buffered Brucella Antigen or card (CT), Complement Fixation (CF), Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Rivanol (Riv) methods were compared. There was a 95% probability for agreement among CT negative sera, between serological methods, for all groups of vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle. The agreement between tests with Riv Positive sera, excluding the calfhood and adult vaccinated group tested by the CF method, was 91-100%. The probability of a serum which was serologically negative by other methods being Riv negative was 98%. The usefulness of serological results from Riv (greater than or equal to 1/50) tests for classifying the reactor status of cattle are of doubtful supplemental value to confirm card test positive results. Vaccination history is an important consideration when evaluating serological data on cattle sera particularly from SAT and CF methods.
对863头接种和未接种19号菌株的成年牛(与疾病状态无关)的总共4551份血清,采用五种血清学方法检测牛流产布鲁氏菌抗体的存在情况。比较了标准试管凝集试验(SAT)、缓冲布鲁氏菌抗原玻片凝集试验(CT)、补体结合试验(CF)、酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和利凡诺试验(Riv)的结果。对于所有接种和未接种牛的组别,CT阴性血清在血清学方法之间达成一致的概率为95%。排除CF法检测的幼年和成年接种组,Riv阳性血清检测之间的一致性为91%-100%。其他方法血清学阴性的血清为Riv阴性的概率为98%。Riv试验(大于或等于1/50)的血清学结果用于对牛的反应状态进行分类,对确认玻片试验阳性结果的补充价值存疑。在评估牛血清的血清学数据时,特别是来自SAT和CF方法的数据时,疫苗接种史是一个重要的考虑因素。