Sylvester K
Social Policy Action Network, Washington, DC, USA.
Future Child. 2001 Spring-Summer;11(1):52-61.
Families make choices about employment and care for their children in a context that is shaped by public policies and colored by public opinion. Debates over whether the government should increase funding for child care or do more to help parents stay home with their children reflect tensions among strongly held ideas about family life, work, and the role of government. This article summarizes the results of public opinion polls that probe attitudes about parent and government roles and responsibilities with respect to children's care. The polling findings yield three main lessons: The American public believes that parents should be the primary influence in their children's lives and that it is best if mothers can be home to care for the very young. The public also values family self-sufficiency and understands that low-income families may need child care assistance to balance child rearing and employment responsibilities. However, skepticism about the appropriateness of government involvement in family life limits public support for proposals that the government act directly to provide or improve child care. From these lessons, the author draws several conclusions for policymakers: Policies focused on caregiving should respect the rights of parents to raise their children by ensuring that an array of options is available. Public programs should help families who are struggling economically to balance their obligations to work and family. Rather than directly providing child care services, government should fund community-based child care programs, and provide flexible assistance to help families secure the services they need and want.
家庭在由公共政策塑造并受公众舆论影响的背景下,对就业和子女照料做出选择。关于政府是否应增加儿童照料资金投入或采取更多措施帮助父母居家陪伴子女的争论,反映了在有关家庭生活、工作及政府角色的坚定观念之间存在的紧张关系。本文总结了民意调查的结果,这些调查探究了公众对父母及政府在儿童照料方面的角色和责任的态度。调查结果带来了三个主要启示:美国公众认为父母应是子女生活中的主要影响因素,并且如果母亲能够在家照料幼儿则最为理想。公众也重视家庭自给自足,并理解低收入家庭可能需要儿童照料援助来平衡育儿和就业责任。然而,对政府介入家庭生活适当性的怀疑限制了公众对政府直接采取行动提供或改善儿童照料的提议的支持。基于这些启示,作者为政策制定者得出了几个结论:专注于照料的政策应通过确保提供一系列选择来尊重父母抚养子女的权利。公共项目应帮助经济困难的家庭平衡工作和家庭义务。政府不应直接提供儿童照料服务,而应资助基于社区的儿童照料项目,并提供灵活的援助,以帮助家庭获得他们需要和想要的服务。