Bayer P M, Fabian B, Hübl W
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wilhelminen Hospital Vienna, Austria.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2001;235:68-76. doi: 10.1080/003655101753352077.
Autoimmune diseases are relatively frequent disease complexes, affecting approximately five to seven percent of the population. After cardio-vascular and malignant diseases they come third in mortality. As the clinical diagnosis of rheumatic autoimmune diseases is difficult, laboratory tests are helpful in differential diagnosis and for verification of the clinical diagnosis. The most commonly used assay is the determination of ANAs (anti nuclear antibodies) by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA). However, this method lacks reliable standardisation and is very dependable on the qualification of the observer. Enzyme Immunoassays (EIA) and Immunoblotting techniques, on the contrary, attain good standardisation and comparability. However, the latter methods are limited to the presentation of defined autoantibodies only. There is a need to select a suitable strategy for the use of laboratory parameters in order to support the clinical diagnosis more efficiently. A possible strategy is to replace IFA as a first line screening-step by second-generation ANA-EIA kits.
自身免疫性疾病是相对常见的疾病复合体,影响着约5%至7%的人口。在心血管疾病和恶性疾病之后,它们的死亡率位居第三。由于风湿性自身免疫性疾病的临床诊断困难,实验室检查有助于鉴别诊断和临床诊断的验证。最常用的检测方法是通过间接免疫荧光法(IFA)测定抗核抗体(ANA)。然而,该方法缺乏可靠的标准化,并且非常依赖观察者的资质。相反,酶免疫测定法(EIA)和免疫印迹技术具有良好的标准化和可比性。然而,后一种方法仅限于检测特定的自身抗体。需要选择一种合适的实验室参数使用策略,以便更有效地支持临床诊断。一种可能的策略是用第二代ANA-EIA试剂盒取代IFA作为一线筛查步骤。