Larivière C, Arsenault A B, Gravel D, Gagnon D, Loisel P
Prévicap, Complexe St-Charles, Longueil, Canada.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Oct;85(6):552-9. doi: 10.1007/s004210100475.
The purpose of this study was to compare the electromyogram median frequency (MF) values from two contraction modes (ramp vs step) at different force levels of eight back muscles. A group of 20 healthy male subjects stood in a dynamometer with the trunk in a vertical position and performed trunk extension contractions using the displayed L5/S1 extension moment as visual feedback. The electromyogram (EMG) signals from four pairs of back muscles were collected at 4,096 Hz using active surface electrodes during two 7 s static ramp contractions ranging from 0% to 100% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and two 5 s static step contractions performed at five forces (10%, 20%, 40%, 60% and 80% MVC). The root mean square (RMS) and MF of the EMG signals corresponding to 250 ms windows were computed at each force level for both contraction modes. The RMS from the ramp contractions were significantly higher than from the step contractions in six muscles. The corresponding MF showed a significant (alpha = 0.05) contraction mode x force interaction in four muscles. A significant contraction mode main effect was obtained in four muscles having higher MF during step than during ramp contractions. These differences were more obvious (10-15 Hz) and more frequent at the lower (10%, 20% and 40% MVC) forces. It was suggested that mechanisms not related to motor unit recruitment might influence MF in contraction modes. These unknown mechanisms contaminate any possible relationship between the MF measurements and muscle composition.
本研究的目的是比较八块背部肌肉在不同力量水平下两种收缩模式(斜坡式与阶梯式)的肌电图中位频率(MF)值。20名健康男性受试者站在测力计中,躯干保持垂直姿势,并以显示的L5/S1伸展力矩作为视觉反馈进行躯干伸展收缩。在两次持续7秒、力量从最大自主收缩(MVC)的0%到100%的静态斜坡收缩以及在五种力量(10%、20%、40%、60%和80%MVC)下进行的两次持续5秒的静态阶梯收缩过程中,使用有源表面电极以4096Hz收集四对背部肌肉的肌电图(EMG)信号。针对两种收缩模式,在每个力量水平计算对应250毫秒窗口内EMG信号的均方根(RMS)和MF。在六块肌肉中,斜坡收缩的RMS显著高于阶梯收缩。在四块肌肉中,相应的MF显示出显著的(α = 0.05)收缩模式×力量交互作用。在四块肌肉中获得了显著的收缩模式主效应,这些肌肉在阶梯收缩期间的MF高于斜坡收缩期间。这些差异在较低力量(10%、20%和40%MVC)时更明显(10 - 15Hz)且更频繁。研究表明,与运动单位募集无关的机制可能会影响收缩模式下的MF。这些未知机制干扰了MF测量与肌肉组成之间的任何可能关系。