Gold R S, Ridge D T
School of Psychology, Deakin University, Victoria, Australia.
AIDS Care. 2001 Dec;13(6):693-708. doi: 10.1080/09540120120076869.
In a qualitative study, 20 HIV-infected Australian gay men were interviewed about their decision not to access antiretroviral drug therapy. The main reasons given for the decision were fear of side effects; fear of long-term damage to body organs; the inconvenience of the treatment regimens; belief that the regimen's demands would be a threat to morale; and belief that there was no reason to start therapy in the absence of AIDS-related symptoms. Actions taken by the men to monitor and maintain their health included seeing a doctor regularly; having regular T-cell and viral load tests; and trying to maintain a positive outlook by not letting HIV/AIDS 'take over' their lives. Almost half the men considered they had been subjected to unreasonable pressure to access therapy and there was considerable pride at having resisted this pressure. The findings suggest that the men disagreed with the biomedical model for managing HIV/AIDS only on the question of if and when to access therapy. They also suggest that underlying the men's dissent from the biomedical model was a different mode of thinking than is required by the model: while the model demands thinking that is abstract, the men focused strongly on factors close to the 'here and now' of immediate experience. The practical implications of the findings are explored.
在一项定性研究中,对20名感染了艾滋病毒的澳大利亚男同性恋者进行了访谈,询问他们不接受抗逆转录病毒药物治疗的决定。做出该决定的主要原因包括:害怕副作用;担心对身体器官造成长期损害;治疗方案不方便;认为治疗方案的要求会对士气构成威胁;以及认为在没有艾滋病相关症状的情况下没有理由开始治疗。这些男性为监测和维持自身健康所采取的行动包括定期看医生;进行定期的T细胞和病毒载量检测;以及通过不让艾滋病毒/艾滋病“掌控”自己的生活来努力保持积极的心态。近一半的男性认为他们在接受治疗方面受到了不合理的压力,并且对抵制这种压力感到相当自豪。研究结果表明,这些男性仅在是否以及何时接受治疗的问题上不同意管理艾滋病毒/艾滋病的生物医学模式。研究结果还表明,这些男性对生物医学模式持不同意见的背后,是一种与该模式所要求的思维方式不同的思维方式:该模式要求进行抽象思维,而这些男性则强烈关注与直接经验的“此时此地”密切相关的因素。本文探讨了这些研究结果的实际意义。