Krings T, Schreckenberger M, Rohde V, Foltys H, Spetzger U, Sabri O, Reinges M H, Kemeny S, Meyer P T, Möller-Hartmann W, Korinth M, Gilsbach J M, Buell U, Thron A
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of the Technical University, Pauwelsstrasse 30, 52057 Aachen, Germany.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;71(6):762-71. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.6.762.
Although functional MRI is widely used for preoperative planning and intraoperative neuronavigation, its accuracy to depict the site of neuronal activity is not exactly known. Experience with methods that may validate fMRI data and the results obtained when coregistering fMRI with different preoperative and intraoperative mapping modalities including metabolically based (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET, electrophysiologcally based transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and direct electrical cortical stimulation (DECS) are described.
Fifty patients were included. PET was performed in 30, TMS in 10, and DECS in 41 patients. After coregistration using a frameless stereotactic system, results were grouped into overlapping (<1 cm distance), neighbouring (<2 cm), or contradictory (>2 cm).
Comparing fMRI with PET, 18 overlapping, seven neighbouring, and one contradictory result were obtained. In four patients no comparison was possible (because of motion artefacts, low signal to noise ratio, and unusual high tumour metabolism in PET). The comparison of TMS and fMRI showed seven overlapping and three neighbouring results. In three patients no DECS results could be obtained. Of the remaining 38 patients, fMRI hand motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the upper limb muscles in 36 patients, and fMRI foot motor tasks were compared with DECS results of the lower limb on 13 occasions. Of those 49 studies, overlapping results were obtained in 31 patients, and neighbouring in 14. On four occasions fMRI did not show functional information (because of motion artefacts and low signal to noise).
All validation techniques have intrinsic limitations that restrict their spatial resolution. However, of 50 investigated patients, there was only one in whom results contradictory to fMRI were obtained. Although it is not thought that fMRI can replace the intraoperatively updated functional information (DECS), it is concluded that fMRI is an important adjunct in the preoperative assessment of patients with tumours in the vicinity of the central region.
尽管功能磁共振成像(fMRI)广泛应用于术前规划和术中神经导航,但其描绘神经元活动部位的准确性尚不完全清楚。本文描述了验证fMRI数据的方法的经验,以及将fMRI与不同的术前和术中映射模式(包括基于代谢的(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、基于电生理学的经颅磁刺激(TMS)和直接皮层电刺激(DECS))进行配准后获得的结果。
纳入50例患者。30例患者进行了PET检查,10例进行了TMS检查,41例进行了DECS检查。使用无框架立体定向系统进行配准后,结果分为重叠(距离<1 cm)、相邻(<2 cm)或矛盾(>2 cm)。
将fMRI与PET进行比较,得到18个重叠结果、7个相邻结果和1个矛盾结果。4例患者无法进行比较(由于运动伪影、低信噪比以及PET中异常高的肿瘤代谢)。TMS与fMRI的比较显示7个重叠结果和3个相邻结果。3例患者未获得DECS结果。在其余38例患者中,36例患者将fMRI手部运动任务与上肢肌肉的DECS结果进行了比较,13次将fMRI足部运动任务与下肢的DECS结果进行了比较。在这49项研究中,31例患者获得了重叠结果,14例患者获得了相邻结果。4次fMRI未显示功能信息(由于运动伪影和低信噪比)。
所有验证技术都有其内在局限性,限制了它们的空间分辨率。然而,在50例接受调查的患者中,只有1例获得了与fMRI矛盾的结果。虽然不认为fMRI可以替代术中更新的功能信息(DECS),但得出的结论是,fMRI是术前评估中央区域附近肿瘤患者的重要辅助手段。