Schmidbauer Stefan, Hallfeldt Klaus K, Sitzmann Günther, Kantelhardt Thorsten, Trupka Arnold
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik Innenstadt, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Ann Surg. 2002 Jan;235(1):27-30. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200201000-00004.
The authors used new ultrasonically activated scissors and blades in open and laparoscopic liver resections to investigate their capabilities.
Despite standardized techniques for liver resection, the surgical death rate ranges from 4% to 20%. Dissection of liver parenchyma may cause considerable blood loss. Further complications include liver failure, hematoma, infections, and bile leakage. The surgical technique is an important factor in preventing intraoperative and postoperative complications. Various techniques have been developed for safe and careful dissection of the liver parenchyma. In addition to blunt dissection using the "finger fracture" technique, various ultrasonic dissectors, water jet dissectors, laser systems, and specially prepared suction devices have been used, but none of these techniques can achieve complete hemostasis during dissection.
The instrument was used in open and laparoscopic liver resections. It works by means of a longitudinally vibrating blade or scissors in tissue dissection, coagulation, and preparation. Denaturation of protein and coagulation of vessels up to 2 to 3 mm is possible as a result of the vibration. In this prospective study of a consecutively sampled case series of 41 patients, the author sought to gain experience in handling this instrument and in its capabilities, and they also measured the extent of intraoperative and postoperative blood loss.
The UltraCision was used for 64 open liver resections in 39 patients and for 2 laparoscopic liver resections in 2 patients. Blood loss in laparoscopic resections was less than 50 mL; in open resections it averaged 820 mL. Eleven patients (28%) needed blood transfusions. There were no biliary leakages or abscesses. One patient died after postoperative bleeding leading to fatal liver failure after 4 weeks. Handling of the instrument and cutting and coagulation quality were satisfactory.
The advantages over other resection techniques are limited heat and smoke generation and the lack of current flow through the patient. The handling and coagulation and cutting quality of the UltraCision appeared satisfactory and safe. The new instrument can be recommended for laparoscopic and open resections of the liver.
作者在开放性和腹腔镜肝切除术中使用新型超声激活剪刀和刀片,以研究其性能。
尽管肝切除技术已标准化,但手术死亡率仍在4%至20%之间。肝实质的解剖可能导致大量失血。进一步的并发症包括肝衰竭、血肿、感染和胆漏。手术技术是预防术中及术后并发症的重要因素。已开发出各种技术用于安全、精细地解剖肝实质。除了使用“手指骨折”技术进行钝性解剖外,还使用了各种超声分离器、水刀分离器、激光系统和特制的吸引装置,但这些技术在解剖过程中均无法实现完全止血。
该器械用于开放性和腹腔镜肝切除术。它通过纵向振动的刀片或剪刀进行组织解剖、凝血和处理。由于振动,可使蛋白质变性并使直径达2至3毫米的血管凝血。在这项对41例连续抽样病例系列的前瞻性研究中,作者试图积累使用该器械及其性能方面的经验,同时还测量了术中及术后的失血量。
39例患者的64例开放性肝切除术和2例患者的2例腹腔镜肝切除术使用了超声切割止血刀(UltraCision)。腹腔镜切除术的失血量少于50毫升;开放性切除术的平均失血量为820毫升。11例患者(28%)需要输血。未发生胆漏或脓肿。1例患者术后4周因出血导致致命性肝衰竭死亡。器械的操作以及切割和凝血质量令人满意。
与其他切除技术相比,其优点是产生的热量和烟雾有限,且无电流通过患者身体。超声切割止血刀的操作以及凝血和切割质量似乎令人满意且安全。可推荐将这种新器械用于肝脏的腹腔镜和开放性切除术。