Cocco P, Rice C H, Chen J Q, McCawley M A, McLaughlin J K, Dosemeci M
Istituto di Medicina del Lavoro, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Am J Ind Med. 2001 Dec;40(6):674-82. doi: 10.1002/ajim.10022.
Aims of our study were to explore whether and to what extent exposure to other lung carcinogens, or staging and clinical features of silicosis modify or confound the association between silica and lung cancer.
We used data from a nested case-control study, conducted in the late 1980s in 29 Chinese mines and potteries (10 tungsten mines, 6 copper and iron mines, 4 tin mines, 8 pottery factories, and 1 clay mine), that included 316 lung cancer cases and 1,356 controls, matched by decade of birth and facility type. The previous analysis of these data presented results by type of mine or factory.
In our study, pooling all 29 Chinese work sites, lung cancer risk showed a modest association with silica exposure. Risk did not vary after excluding subjects with silicosis or adjusting the risk estimates by radiological staging of silicosis. Strong correlation among exposures prevented a detailed evaluation of the role of individual exposures. However, lung cancer risk was for the most part absent when concomitant exposure to other workplace lung carcinogens, such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nickel or radon-daughters, was considered. The cross classification of lung cancer risk by categories of exposure to respirable silica and total respirable dust did not show an independent effect of total respirable dust. Silicosis showed a modest association with lung cancer, which did not vary by severity of radiological staging, or by radiological evidence of disease progression, or by level of silica exposure. However, among silicotic subjects, lung cancer risk was significantly elevated only when exposure to cadmium and PAH had occurred.
Our results suggest that, among silica-exposed Chinese workers, numerous occupational and non-occupational risk factors interact in a complex fashion to modify lung cancer risk. Future epidemiological studies on silica and lung cancer should incorporate detailed information on exposure to other workplace lung carcinogens, total respirable dust, and on surface size and age of silica particles to understand whether and to what extent they affect the carcinogenic potential of silica.
我们研究的目的是探讨接触其他肺癌致癌物,或矽肺的分期及临床特征是否会改变或混淆二氧化硅与肺癌之间的关联,以及这种改变或混淆的程度如何。
我们使用了一项巢式病例对照研究的数据,该研究于20世纪80年代末在中国的29个矿山和陶瓷厂(10个钨矿、6个铜铁矿、4个锡矿、8个陶瓷厂和1个粘土矿)开展,研究纳入了316例肺癌病例和1356例对照,根据出生年代和工厂类型进行匹配。之前对这些数据的分析按矿山或工厂类型呈现了结果。
在我们的研究中,汇总中国所有29个工作场所的数据后,肺癌风险与二氧化硅暴露呈现出适度关联。排除矽肺患者或根据矽肺的放射学分期调整风险估计值后,风险并无变化。暴露之间的强相关性妨碍了对个体暴露作用的详细评估。然而,当考虑同时接触其他工作场所肺癌致癌物,如多环芳烃(PAHs)、镍或氡子体时,肺癌风险在很大程度上并不存在。根据可吸入二氧化硅和总可吸入粉尘的暴露类别对肺癌风险进行交叉分类,未显示总可吸入粉尘的独立作用。矽肺与肺癌呈现出适度关联,这种关联并不因放射学分期的严重程度、疾病进展的放射学证据或二氧化硅暴露水平而有所不同。然而,在矽肺患者中,仅当同时接触镉和PAH时,肺癌风险才会显著升高。
我们的结果表明,在中国接触二氧化硅的工人中,众多职业和非职业风险因素以复杂的方式相互作用,从而改变肺癌风险。未来关于二氧化硅与肺癌的流行病学研究应纳入有关接触其他工作场所肺癌致癌物、总可吸入粉尘以及二氧化硅颗粒的表面积和年龄的详细信息,以了解它们是否以及在何种程度上影响二氧化硅的致癌潜力。