Suppr超能文献

三种不同镇痛技术对开胸术后长期疼痛的影响。

The effects of three different analgesia techniques on long-term postthoracotomy pain.

作者信息

Sentürk Mert, Ozcan Perihan Ergin, Talu Gül Köknel, Kiyan Esen, Camci Emre, Ozyalçin Süleyman, Dilege Sükrü, Pembeci Kamil

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical Faculty of Istanbul, University of Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):11-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/00000539-200201000-00003.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

In this clinical, randomized, prospective study, we compared the effects of three different analgesia techniques (thoracic epidural analgesia [TEA] with and without preoperative initiation and IV patient-controlled analgesia [IV-PCA]) on postthoracotomy pain in 69 patients. In two groups, a thoracic epidural catheter was inserted preoperatively. Group Pre-TEA had bupivacaine and morphine solution preoperatively and intraoperatively. Postoperative analgesia was maintained with epidural PCA with a similar solution. Group Post-TEA, with no intraoperative medication, had the same postoperative analgesia as Group Pre-TEA plus the bolus dose. Group IV-PCA received only IV-PCA with morphine for postoperative analgesia. Pain was evaluated every 4 h during the first 48 h at rest, cough, and movement. Pre-TEA was associated with decreased pain compared with the other groups. Six months later, the patients were asked about their pain. The incidence and the intensity of pain were most frequent in Group IV-PCA (78%) and were the least in Group Pre-TEA (45%) (Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.0233; Group Pre-TEA versus Group IV-PCA, P = 0.014). Patients having pain on the second postoperative day had 83% chronic pain. TEA with preoperative initiation is a preferable method in preventing acute and long-term thoracotomy pain.

IMPLICATIONS

Preoperatively initiated thoracic epidural analgesia has the most satisfying results in controlling postthoracotomy pain in the acute and long-term period, and it is associated with a decreased incidence (and intensity) of chronic pain compared with postoperative (epidural or IV) analgesia. Chronic pain has an incidence of 62%.

摘要

未标注

在这项临床随机前瞻性研究中,我们比较了三种不同镇痛技术(术前开始与未开始的胸段硬膜外镇痛[TEA]以及静脉自控镇痛[IV-PCA])对69例开胸术后疼痛的影响。两组患者术前均插入胸段硬膜外导管。术前TEA组术前及术中使用布比卡因和吗啡溶液,术后用类似溶液行硬膜外自控镇痛维持镇痛。术后TEA组术中未用药,术后镇痛与术前TEA组相同并追加单次剂量。IV-PCA组术后仅采用吗啡静脉自控镇痛。在术后48小时内,每4小时评估一次静息、咳嗽及活动时的疼痛情况。与其他组相比,术前TEA组疼痛减轻。六个月后,询问患者疼痛情况。IV-PCA组疼痛发生率和强度最高(78%),术前TEA组最低(45%)(术前TEA组与IV-PCA组比较,P = 0.0233;术前TEA组与IV-PCA组比较,P = 0.014)。术后第二天仍有疼痛的患者慢性疼痛发生率为83%。术前开始的TEA是预防开胸术后急性和长期疼痛的较好方法。

启示

术前开始的胸段硬膜外镇痛在控制开胸术后急性和长期疼痛方面效果最令人满意,与术后(硬膜外或静脉)镇痛相比,其慢性疼痛的发生率(和强度)降低。慢性疼痛发生率为62%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验