Guzick D S, Overstreet J W, Factor-Litvak P, Brazil C K, Nakajima S T, Coutifaris C, Carson S A, Cisneros P, Steinkampf M P, Hill J A, Xu D, Vogel D L
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY 14642, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1388-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa003005.
Although semen analysis is routinely used to evaluate the male partner in infertile couples, sperm measurements that discriminate between fertile and infertile men are not well defined.
We evaluated two semen specimens from each of the male partners in 765 infertile couples and 696 fertile couples at nine sites. The female partners in the infertile couples had normal results on fertility evaluation. The sperm concentration and motility were determined at the sites; semen smears were stained at the sites and shipped to a central laboratory for an assessment of morphologic features of sperm with the use of strict criteria. We used classification-and-regression-tree analysis to estimate threshold values for subfertility and fertility with respect to the sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. We also used an analysis of receiver-operating-characteristic curves to assess the relative value of these sperm measurements in discriminating between fertile and infertile men.
The subfertile ranges were a sperm concentration of less than 13.5 x 10(6) per milliliter, less than 32 percent of sperm with motility, and less than 9 percent with normal morphologic features. The fertile ranges were a concentration of more than 48.0 x 10(6) per milliliter, greater than 63 percent motility, and greater than 12 percent normal morphologic features. Values between these ranges indicated indeterminate fertility. There was extensive overlap between the fertile and the infertile men within both the subfertile and the fertile ranges for all three measurements. Although each of the sperm measurements helped to distinguish between fertile and infertile men, none was a powerful discriminator. The percentage of sperm with normal morphologic features had the greatest discriminatory power.
Threshold values for sperm concentration, motility, and morphology can be used to classify men as subfertile, of indeterminate fertility, or fertile. None of the measures, however, are diagnostic of infertility.
尽管精液分析常用于评估不育夫妇中的男性伴侣,但区分生育能力正常和不育男性的精子测量指标尚未明确界定。
我们在9个地点对765对不育夫妇和696对生育能力正常夫妇的男性伴侣各评估了两份精液标本。不育夫妇中的女性伴侣生育能力评估结果正常。在各地点测定精子浓度和活力;精液涂片在各地点染色后送至中心实验室,按照严格标准评估精子的形态特征。我们使用分类回归树分析来估计精子浓度、活力和形态方面的亚生育能力和生育能力的阈值。我们还使用受试者操作特征曲线分析来评估这些精子测量指标在区分生育能力正常和不育男性方面的相对价值。
亚生育能力范围为精子浓度低于每毫升13.5×10⁶个、活力精子低于32%、形态正常的精子低于9%。生育能力正常范围为浓度高于每毫升48.0×10⁶个、活力高于63%、形态正常的精子高于12%。这些范围之间的值表明生育能力不确定。在所有三项测量指标的亚生育能力和生育能力正常范围内,生育能力正常和不育男性之间存在广泛重叠。尽管每项精子测量指标都有助于区分生育能力正常和不育男性,但没有一项是强有力的区分指标。形态正常的精子百分比具有最大的区分能力。
精子浓度、活力和形态的阈值可用于将男性分类为亚生育能力、生育能力不确定或生育能力正常。然而,这些指标均不能诊断不育症。