Mohr J P, Thompson J L, Lazar R M, Levin B, Sacco R L, Furie K L, Kistler J P, Albers G W, Pettigrew L C, Adams H P, Jackson C M, Pullicino P
Neurological Institute, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1444-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011258.
Despite the use of antiplatelet agents, usually aspirin, in patients who have had an ischemic stroke, there is still a substantial rate of recurrence. Therefore, we investigated whether warfarin, which is effective and superior to aspirin in the prevention of cardiogenic embolism, would also prove superior in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with a prior noncardioembolic ischemic stroke.
In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial, we compared the effect of warfarin (at a dose adjusted to produce an international normalized ratio of 1.4 to 2.8) and that of aspirin (325 mg per day) on the combined primary end point of recurrent ischemic stroke or death from any cause within two years.
The two randomized study groups were similar with respect to base-line risk factors. In the intention-to-treat analysis, no significant differences were found between the treatment groups in any of the outcomes measured. The primary end point of death or recurrent ischemic stroke was reached by 196 of 1103 patients assigned to warfarin (17.8 percent) and 176 of 1103 assigned to aspirin (16.0 percent; P=0.25; hazard ratio comparing warfarin with aspirin, 1.13; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.92 to 1.38). The rates of major hemorrhage were low (2.22 per 100 patient-years in the warfarin group and 1.49 per 100 patient-years in the aspirin group). Also, there were no significant treatment-related differences in the frequency of or time to the primary end point or major hemorrhage according to the cause of the initial stroke (1237 patients had had previous small-vessel or lacunar infarcts, 576 had had cryptogenic infarcts, and 259 had had infarcts designated as due to severe stenosis or occlusion of a large artery).
Over two years, we found no difference between aspirin and warfarin in the prevention of recurrent ischemic stroke or death or in the rate of major hemorrhage. Consequently, we regard both warfarin and aspirin as reasonable therapeutic alternatives.
尽管对缺血性卒中患者使用了抗血小板药物(通常为阿司匹林),但复发率仍然很高。因此,我们研究了在预防心源性栓塞方面有效且优于阿司匹林的华法林,在预防既往有非心源性栓塞性缺血性卒中患者的复发性缺血性卒中方面是否也更具优势。
在一项多中心、双盲、随机试验中,我们比较了华法林(剂量调整至国际标准化比值为1.4至2.8)和阿司匹林(每日325毫克)对两年内复发性缺血性卒中或任何原因导致的死亡这一联合主要终点的影响。
两个随机研究组在基线危险因素方面相似。在意向性分析中,各治疗组在任何测量结果上均未发现显著差异。在分配接受华法林治疗的1103例患者中,有196例(17.8%)达到了死亡或复发性缺血性卒中的主要终点;在分配接受阿司匹林治疗的1103例患者中,有176例(16.0%)达到该终点(P = 0.25;华法林与阿司匹林相比的风险比为1.13;95%置信区间为0.92至1.38)。大出血发生率较低(华法林组每100患者年为2.22例,阿司匹林组每100患者年为1.49例)。此外,根据初始卒中病因(1237例患者既往有小血管或腔隙性梗死,576例有隐源性梗死,259例有因大动脉严重狭窄或闭塞所致的梗死),在主要终点或大出血的发生频率或时间方面,各治疗组之间无显著差异。
在两年时间里,我们发现阿司匹林和华法林在预防复发性缺血性卒中或死亡以及大出血发生率方面没有差异。因此,我们认为华法林和阿司匹林都是合理的治疗选择。