Miric D, Senohradski K, Vucetic C, Djordjevic Z
Institute of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade.
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2001 May-Jun;129(5-6):129-34.
The most common fracture involving the wrist is a fracture of the scaphoid bone [1], and only 5% to 10% of these fractures proceed to nonunion. Although not symptomatic initially, most (if not all) nonunions later produce a painful wrist with impaired function, clinically significant loss of motion, increased weakness and degenerative arthritis. Nonunion of the scaphoid bone should be treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Many surgical procedures have been advocated to achieve union. Most widely used technique for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion was described by Russe [2], but this method may overcome the flexion deformity of the scaphoid and carpal deformities. The ununited scaphoid usually undergoes resorption of the fractures surfaces, principally over the anterolateral aspect of the fracture, so that the scaphoid becomes misshapen. The restoration of the exact length and form is enabled by insertion of a tight-fitting trapezoidal corticocancellous graft, a technique described by Fernandez [11].
We analysed the results of treatment of scaphoid nonunion utilized by two bone-grafting techniques and pointed out the need of choice of the best operative method.
From 1977 to 1993, at the Institute of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology in Belgrade, 40 patients were surgically treated for symptomatic nonunion of the scaphoid bone. The mean duration of follow-up was 10.2 years (range, from 6 to 22 years). Eighteen (45%) patients were operated by Fernandez technique and 22 (55%) patients were operated using Russe's technique. Volar approach and Kirschner's wire fixation were performed in both operative methods. We used two rating scales proposed by Cooney [13] to evaluate the results. Objective scale (Table 1a) included the radiographic appearance of the wrist, the range of motion and grip strength. Subjective scale (Table 1b) comprised function, pain perception of a decrease in performance because of limited motion or strength, and satisfaction. These scales were used to compare the objective and subjective results in patients who had postoperatively carpal collapse with the results in patients who had not such deformity.
The union rate was 92.5% in both methods. Russe's technique resulted in union in 20 (91%) of 22 cases with two ununited. Fernandez technique achieved union in 17 (94%) of 18 cases. Fracture union was determined by both clinical and roentgenographic examinations. Correction of the lateral interscaphoid angle was obtained in 14 (82%) patients operated by Fernandez technique and 9 (45%) patients operated by Russe's technique. Correction of dorsal tilt of the lunate were achieved in 6 (30%) patients operated by Russe's technique, and 13 (76.6%) patients operated by Fernandez technique. There was a highly significant correlation (p < 0.01) between increased deformity of the scaphoid and extent of carpal collapse (Graph 1). Also, there was significant difference between two operative techniques regarding correction of lateral interscaphoid angle (p < 0.05). Arthrosis of the wrist was present in all patients. We could not demonstrate a significant difference (p > 0.05) between intensity of degenerative changes and increase of lateral interscaphoid angle, but obviously, the large flexion deformity of the scaphoid the worse intensity of degenerative changes (Graph 2). The grip strength significantly increased after Fernandez technique (p > 0.05) (Graph 3), but wrist motion changed a little. The average objective score was 71 points for the patients in whom the lateral interscaphoid angle was 45 degrees or less, and 63 points for those in whom the angle was more than 45 degrees. This difference was significant (p < 0.05), but we could not demonstrate a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the average subjective score.
In our series, both procedures provided a high union rate [2]. In cases with severe scaphoid shortening and flexion deformity, Russe's procedure has proved to be insufficient to restore anatomic length and correction of carpal alignment [6, 11, 17]. Previous authors have reported that the progression in degenerative changes was slower in patients who had a lateral interscaphoid angle less than 45 degrees [13]. Also, grip strength and range of motion increased in patients in whom flexion deformity of the scaphoid had been corrected [2, 4, 6, 16, 17]. Our study supports these findings, except results regarding the movement. We believe that this was due to postoperative scarring. Discrepancy between the subjective and objective results may have been due to postoperative relief of pain obtained by increased carpal stability or decreased range of motion of the carpal joints due to postoperative scarring. If pain is relieved, patients readily adapt to the functional deficit of decreased range of motion. We concluded that angulatory collapse of the scaphoid resulted in nonunion as well as malunion with secondary functional loss. Recognition and avoidance in acute fractures were important. When recognised late, volar wedge grafting appeared to be a satisfactory method of treatment.
腕部最常见的骨折是舟骨骨折[1],其中只有5%至10%的骨折会发展为骨不连。虽然最初没有症状,但大多数(如果不是全部)骨不连后来会导致腕部疼痛、功能受损、临床上明显的活动丧失、力量减弱和退行性关节炎。舟骨骨不连应通过切开复位内固定进行治疗。人们提倡采用多种外科手术来实现骨愈合。治疗舟骨骨不连最广泛使用的技术是由鲁斯(Russe)[2]描述的,但这种方法可能会克服舟骨的屈曲畸形和腕骨畸形。未愈合的舟骨通常会出现骨折面吸收,主要是在骨折的前外侧,从而使舟骨变形。通过插入紧密贴合的梯形皮质松质骨移植来恢复准确的长度和形态,这是费尔南德斯(Fernandez)[11]描述的一种技术。
我们分析了两种植骨技术治疗舟骨骨不连的结果,并指出选择最佳手术方法的必要性。
1977年至1993年,在贝尔格莱德的矫形外科和创伤研究所,40例有症状的舟骨骨不连患者接受了手术治疗。平均随访时间为10.2年(范围为6至22年)。18例(45%)患者采用费尔南德斯技术手术,22例(55%)患者采用鲁斯技术手术。两种手术方法均采用掌侧入路和克氏针固定。我们使用库尼(Cooney)[13]提出的两个评分量表来评估结果。客观量表(表1a)包括腕部的X线表现、活动范围和握力。主观量表(表1b)包括功能、因活动或力量受限导致的性能下降的疼痛感知以及满意度。这些量表用于比较术后出现腕骨塌陷的患者与未出现这种畸形的患者的客观和主观结果。
两种方法的骨愈合率均为92.5%。鲁斯技术在22例中有20例(91%)实现骨愈合,2例未愈合。费尔南德斯技术在18例中有17例(94%)实现骨愈合。骨折愈合通过临床和X线检查确定。采用费尔南德斯技术手术的14例(82%)患者和采用鲁斯技术手术的9例(45%)患者的舟骨间外侧角得到矫正。采用鲁斯技术手术的6例(30%)患者和采用费尔南德斯技术手术的13例(76.6%)患者的月骨背倾得到矫正。舟骨畸形增加与腕骨塌陷程度之间存在高度显著相关性(p < 0.01)(图1)。此外,两种手术技术在矫正舟骨间外侧角方面存在显著差异(p < 0.05)。所有患者均出现腕关节关节炎。我们未能证明退行性改变的强度与舟骨间外侧角增加之间存在显著差异(p > 0.05),但显然,舟骨的大屈曲畸形会使退行性改变的强度更严重(图2)。费尔南德斯技术后握力显著增加(p > 0.05)(图3),但腕部活动变化不大。舟骨间外侧角为45度或更小的患者平均客观评分为71分,角度大于45度的患者平均客观评分为63分。这种差异具有显著性(p < 0.05),但我们未能证明两组在平均主观评分方面存在显著差异。
在我们的系列研究中,两种手术方法均提供了较高的骨愈合率[2]。在舟骨严重缩短和屈曲畸形的病例中,鲁斯手术已被证明不足以恢复解剖长度和矫正腕骨对线[6,11,17]。先前的作者报告称,舟骨间外侧角小于45度的患者退行性改变的进展较慢[13]。此外,矫正舟骨屈曲畸形的患者握力和活动范围增加[2,4,6,16,17]。我们的研究支持这些发现,但关于活动的结果除外。我们认为这是由于术后瘢痕形成。主观和客观结果之间的差异可能是由于腕骨稳定性增加导致术后疼痛缓解或术后瘢痕形成导致腕关节活动范围减小。如果疼痛得到缓解,患者很容易适应活动范围减小的功能缺陷。我们得出结论,舟骨的成角塌陷导致骨不连以及畸形愈合并伴有继发性功能丧失。在急性骨折中识别并避免这种情况很重要。如果发现较晚,掌侧楔形植骨似乎是一种令人满意的治疗方法。