Howe Mark L
Centre of Excellence for Children and Adolescents With Special Needs, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Dev Psychol. 2002 Jan;38(1):3-14. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.1.3.
Preschool and kindergarten children's retention of stories was examined in the presence of interfering information and instructions to forget. Children learned 2 stories and, 24 hr later, were asked to recall the 1st or 2nd story learned. Some of the children were instructed, either following acquisition or just prior to the retention test, to forget the 2nd, or interfering, story. A model was used to isolate storage and retrieval effects, and the results showed that (a) retroactive interference affected both storage- and retrieval-based forgetting rates for the younger children but only storage-based forgetting rates for the older children, (b) intentional forgetting reduced retroactive interference primarily by attenuating storage-based forgetting regardless of age, (c) intentional forgetting instructions were effective only at acquisition for preschoolers but at both acquisition and retention for kindergarteners, and (d) all children recalled the to-be-forgotten story as well as they recalled the to-be-remembered story. These results are interpreted in terms of reorganization and distinctiveness effects in storage.
在存在干扰信息和遗忘指令的情况下,对学龄前和幼儿园儿童对故事的记忆进行了研究。儿童学习了两个故事,24小时后,被要求回忆所学的第一个或第二个故事。一些儿童在习得后或就在记忆测试之前,被指示忘记第二个干扰故事。使用一个模型来分离存储和检索效应,结果表明:(a)倒摄干扰影响了年幼儿童基于存储和检索的遗忘率,但只影响了年长儿童基于存储的遗忘率;(b)有意遗忘主要通过减弱基于存储的遗忘来减少倒摄干扰,而与年龄无关;(c)有意遗忘指令对学龄前儿童仅在习得时有效,而对幼儿园儿童在习得和记忆时均有效;(d)所有儿童对要遗忘的故事和要记住的故事的回忆效果一样好。这些结果根据存储中的重组和独特性效应进行了解释。