Hennrikus Deborah J, Jeffery Robert W, Lando Harry A, Murray David M, Brelje Kerrin, Davidann Beth, Baxter Judith S, Thai Dzung, Vessey John, Liu Jane
Division of Epidemiology, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, 55454-1054, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2002 Feb;92(2):274-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.92.2.274.
This study examined the effect of program format and incentives on participation and cessation in worksite smoking cessation programs.
Twenty-four worksites were randomized to 6 conditions that differed in cessation program format and the use of incentives. Programs were offered for 18 months in each worksite. A total of 2402 cigarette smokers identified at baseline were surveyed 12 and 24 months later to assess participation in programs and cessation.
A total of 407 (16.9%) of the smoker cohort registered for programs; on the 12- and 24-month surveys, 15.4% and 19.4% of the cohort, respectively, reported that they had not smoked in the previous 7 days. Registration for programs in incentive sites was almost double that of no-incentive sites (22.4% vs 11.9%), but increased registration did not translate into significantly greater cessation rates. Program type did not affect registration or cessation rates.
Although incentives increase rates of registration in worksite smoking cessation programs, they do not appear to increase cessation rates. Phone counseling seems to be at least as effective as group programs for promoting smoking cessation in worksites.
本研究探讨了项目形式和激励措施对工作场所戒烟项目参与率和戒烟成功率的影响。
24个工作场所被随机分为6种不同的条件,这些条件在戒烟项目形式和激励措施的使用上存在差异。每个工作场所的项目为期18个月。对基线时识别出的2402名吸烟者在12个月和24个月后进行调查,以评估他们对项目的参与情况和戒烟情况。
共有407名(16.9%)吸烟者登记参加了项目;在12个月和24个月的调查中,分别有15.4%和19.4%的吸烟者报告称在过去7天内没有吸烟。有激励措施场所的项目登记率几乎是无激励措施场所的两倍(22.4%对11.9%),但登记率的提高并没有转化为显著更高的戒烟成功率。项目类型对登记率或戒烟成功率没有影响。
尽管激励措施提高了工作场所戒烟项目的登记率,但似乎并没有提高戒烟成功率。在工作场所促进戒烟方面,电话咨询似乎至少与团体项目一样有效。