Suppr超能文献

VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0、QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0和COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR 2.0检测法用于血清中丙型肝炎病毒RNA定量的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0, QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0, and COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 Assays for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum.

作者信息

Germer Jeffrey J, Heimgartner Paul J, Ilstrup Duane M, Harmsen W Scott, Jenkins Greg D, Patel Robin

机构信息

Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Feb;40(2):495-500. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.495-500.2002.

Abstract

A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.

摘要

对通过VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0(分支DNA-3.0)检测、QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0(分支DNA-2.0)检测和COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR 2.0版(HCM-2.0)检测获得的以每毫升丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)国际单位表示的定量结果进行了比较。共研究了168份提交给梅奥诊所分子微生物学实验室进行HCV定量或HCV基因分型的患者标本。在检测的标本中,分别有97%、88%和79%的标本在分支DNA-3.0、分支DNA-2.0和HCM-2.0检测的动态范围内产生了定量结果。总体而言,所有三种检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性。通过分支DNA-3.0检测确定病毒载量<31,746 IU/ml的29份标本中,共有15份(52%)被分支DNA-2.0检测归类为病毒载量在31,746至500,000 IU/ml范围内。虽然分支DNA-2.0和分支DNA-3.0检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性,但注意到分支DNA-2.0检测有偏向更高病毒滴度的偏差(P = 0.001)。同样,虽然HCM-2.0和分支DNA-3.0检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性,但注意到分支DNA-3.0检测有偏向更高病毒滴度的偏差(P≤0.001)。当病毒载量>500,000 IU/ml时,HCM-2.0和分支DNA-3.0结果之间的差异更为明显,并且在确定病毒载量是否高于或低于800,000 IU/ml的HCV RNA(联合治疗疗程调整的建议阈值)方面导致了统计学上的显著差异(P≤0.001)。以每毫升HCV国际单位表示定量值是分支DNA-3.0和HCM-2.0检测的一个优点。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jun;40(6):2031-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.6.2031-2036.2002.
7
Multilaboratory comparison of hepatitis C virus viral load assays.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 May;44(5):1726-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1726-1732.2006.
10
Multicenter evaluation of the performance characteristics of the bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA).
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):563-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.563-569.2004.

引用本文的文献

1
Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Vertical Transmission in 12-Month-Old Infants Born to HCV-Infected Women and Assessment of Maternal Risk Factors.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 26;2(2):ofv089. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv089. eCollection 2015 Apr.
2
Performance of the Abbott real-time PCR assay using m2000sp and m2000rt for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification.
J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1726-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01300-08. Epub 2009 Apr 15.
6
Performance characteristics of a quantitative TaqMan hepatitis C virus RNA analyte-specific reagent.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Aug;42(8):3739-46. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3739-3746.2004.
7
Variable ratio of hepatitis C virus RNA to viral core antigen in patient sera.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 May;42(5):1977-81. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.1977-1981.2004.
8
Multicenter evaluation of the performance characteristics of the bayer VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA).
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Feb;42(2):563-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.563-569.2004.
9
Strengths and limitations of commercial tests for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification.
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jan;42(1):421-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.1.421-425.2004.
10
Laboratory assays for diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus infection.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Dec;40(12):4407-12. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4407-4412.2002.

本文引用的文献

2
Standardization of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification.
Hepatology. 2000 Sep;32(3):654-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.16603.
7
Genotype dependence of hepatitis C virus load measurement in commercially available quantitative assays.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Aug;37(8):2525-32. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.8.2525-2532.1999.
10
Quantification of serum hepatitis C virus RNA.
Hepatology. 1999 Mar;29(3):997-8. doi: 10.1002/hep.510290316.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验