Germer Jeffrey J, Heimgartner Paul J, Ilstrup Duane M, Harmsen W Scott, Jenkins Greg D, Patel Robin
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Feb;40(2):495-500. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.2.495-500.2002.
A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.
对通过VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0(分支DNA-3.0)检测、QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0(分支DNA-2.0)检测和COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR 2.0版(HCM-2.0)检测获得的以每毫升丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)国际单位表示的定量结果进行了比较。共研究了168份提交给梅奥诊所分子微生物学实验室进行HCV定量或HCV基因分型的患者标本。在检测的标本中,分别有97%、88%和79%的标本在分支DNA-3.0、分支DNA-2.0和HCM-2.0检测的动态范围内产生了定量结果。总体而言,所有三种检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性。通过分支DNA-3.0检测确定病毒载量<31,746 IU/ml的29份标本中,共有15份(52%)被分支DNA-2.0检测归类为病毒载量在31,746至500,000 IU/ml范围内。虽然分支DNA-2.0和分支DNA-3.0检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性,但注意到分支DNA-2.0检测有偏向更高病毒滴度的偏差(P = 0.001)。同样,虽然HCM-2.0和分支DNA-3.0检测产生的结果之间存在高度一致性,但注意到分支DNA-3.0检测有偏向更高病毒滴度的偏差(P≤0.001)。当病毒载量>500,000 IU/ml时,HCM-2.0和分支DNA-3.0结果之间的差异更为明显,并且在确定病毒载量是否高于或低于800,000 IU/ml的HCV RNA(联合治疗疗程调整的建议阈值)方面导致了统计学上的显著差异(P≤0.001)。以每毫升HCV国际单位表示定量值是分支DNA-3.0和HCM-2.0检测的一个优点。