Suppr超能文献

解构以患者为中心的沟通并揭示共同决策:一项观察性研究。

Deconstructing patient centred communication and uncovering shared decision making: an observational study.

作者信息

Wensing Michel, Elwyn Glyn, Edwards Adrian, Vingerhoets Eric, Grol Richard

机构信息

Centre for Quality of Care Research, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, P,O, Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002;2:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-2-2. Epub 2002 Jan 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient centred communication (PCC) has been described as a method for doctor-patient communication. The principles of shared decision making (SDM) have been proposed more recently.

AIMS

This study aimed to examine PCC and SDM empirically with respect to their mutual association, the variation in practitioners' working styles, and the associations with patient characteristics.

METHODS

Sixty general practitioners recruited 596 adult patients who gave written consent to have their consultations videotaped. The tapes were assessed by two researchers, using a standardised instrument for global communication. For the purpose of this exploratory study, scales for PCC and SDM were based on subsamples of items in the MAAS.

RESULTS

The scales for PCC and SDM were weakly associated (Pearson correlation: 0.25). Physicians varied more on SDM than on PCC. The intracluster correlation of the PCC and SDM scales were, respectively, 0.34 and 0.19. However, hypotheses regarding associations with patient characteristics were not confirmed. Neither PCC nor SDM scores were related to patient gender, education, age, functional health status or existence of chronic conditions.

CONCLUSION

The study provides evidence that PCC and SDM can be differentiated and comprise approaches to communication between clinicians and patients which may be more clearly distinguished by further focused research and training developments.

摘要

背景

以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)已被描述为一种医患沟通方法。共享决策(SDM)原则是最近才提出的。

目的

本研究旨在实证检验PCC和SDM之间的相互关联、从业者工作方式的差异以及与患者特征的关联。

方法

60名全科医生招募了596名成年患者,这些患者书面同意对其会诊进行录像。两名研究人员使用标准化的整体沟通工具对录像带进行评估。在这项探索性研究中,PCC和SDM的量表基于MAAS中项目的子样本。

结果

PCC和SDM的量表相关性较弱(皮尔逊相关系数:0.25)。医生在SDM方面的差异比在PCC方面更大。PCC和SDM量表的组内相关系数分别为0.34和0.19。然而,关于与患者特征关联的假设未得到证实。PCC和SDM得分均与患者性别、教育程度、年龄、功能健康状况或慢性病的存在无关。

结论

该研究提供了证据,表明PCC和SDM可以区分,并且包含临床医生与患者之间的沟通方法,通过进一步有针对性的研究和培训发展,这些方法可能会得到更清晰的区分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a276/65523/9c6e1d5dc078/1472-6947-2-2-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验