Dellaglio Franco, Felis Giovanna E, Torriani Sandra
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002 Jan;52(Pt 1):285-287. doi: 10.1099/00207713-52-1-285.
On the basis of considerable published evidence, it is concluded that the species Lactobacillus casei is not correctly represented by the strain actually designated as the type strain ATCC 393. It is proposed that the Judicial Commission consider: (1) that ATCC 393T is scientifically unsuitable as the type strain of Lactobacillus casei and should be reclassified as Lactobacillus zeae; (2) that Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 and Lactobacillus paracasei strains are members of the same taxon and therefore can be united within the name Lactobacillus casei (Rules 42 and 23a), the name Lactobacillus paracasei being rejected; and (3) designating ATCC 334 as the neotype strain for the species
基于大量已发表的证据,得出结论:实际指定为模式菌株ATCC 393的菌株不能正确代表干酪乳杆菌物种。建议司法委员会考虑:(1) ATCC 393T作为干酪乳杆菌的模式菌株在科学上不合适,应重新分类为玉米乳杆菌;(2) 干酪乳杆菌ATCC 334和副干酪乳杆菌菌株属于同一分类单元,因此可以统一在干酪乳杆菌名下(规则42和23a),副干酪乳杆菌这一名称被废弃;(3) 指定ATCC 334为该物种的新模式菌株