Ma Yongsheng, Zeng Shan, Metcalfe Dean D, Akin Cem, Dimitrijevic Sasa, Butterfield Joseph H, McMahon Gerald, Longley B Jack
Department of Dermatology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Blood. 2002 Mar 1;99(5):1741-4. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.5.1741.
Mutations of c-KIT causing spontaneous activation of the KIT receptor kinase are associated with sporadic adult human mastocytosis (SAHM) and with human gastrointestinal stromal tumors. We have classified KIT-activating mutations as either "enzymatic site" type (EST) mutations, affecting the structure of the catalytic portion of the kinase, or as "regulatory" type (RT) mutations, affecting regulation of an otherwise normal catalytic site. Using COS cells expressing wild-type or mutant KIT, 2 compounds, STI571 and SU9529, inhibited wild-type and RT mutant KIT at 0.1 to 1 microM but did not significantly inhibit the Asp816Val EST mutant associated with SAHM, even at 10 microM. Using 2 subclones of the HMC1 mast cell line, which both express KIT with an identical RT mutation but which differ in that one also expresses the Asp816Val EST mutation, both compounds inhibited the RT mutant KIT, thereby suppressing proliferation and producing apoptosis in the RT mutant-only cell line. Neither compound suppressed activation of Asp816Val EST mutant KIT, and neither produced apoptosis or significantly suppressed proliferation of the cell line expressing the Asp816Val mutation. These studies suggest that currently available KIT inhibitors may be useful in treating neoplastic cells expressing KIT activated by its natural ligand or by RT activating mutations such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors but that neither compound is likely to be effective against SAHM. Furthermore, these results help establish a general paradigm whereby classification of mutations affecting oncogenic enzymes as RT or EST may be useful in predicting tumor sensitivity or resistance to inhibitory drugs.
导致KIT受体激酶自发激活的c-KIT突变与散发性成人肥大细胞增多症(SAHM)及人类胃肠道间质瘤相关。我们将KIT激活突变分为“酶促位点”型(EST)突变,即影响激酶催化部分结构的突变,以及“调节”型(RT)突变,即影响原本正常催化位点调节的突变。利用表达野生型或突变型KIT的COS细胞,两种化合物STI571和SU9529在0.1至1微摩尔浓度下可抑制野生型和RT突变型KIT,但即使在10微摩尔浓度下,也不能显著抑制与SAHM相关的Asp816Val EST突变型。利用HMC1肥大细胞系的两个亚克隆,它们都表达具有相同RT突变的KIT,但不同之处在于其中一个还表达Asp816Val EST突变,两种化合物均抑制RT突变型KIT,从而抑制仅表达RT突变型的细胞系的增殖并诱导凋亡。两种化合物均未抑制Asp816Val EST突变型KIT的激活,也未诱导表达Asp816Val突变的细胞系凋亡或显著抑制其增殖。这些研究表明,目前可用的KIT抑制剂可能对治疗表达由其天然配体或RT激活突变(如胃肠道间质瘤)激活的KIT的肿瘤细胞有用,但两种化合物可能都对SAHM无效。此外,这些结果有助于建立一个通用范式,即把影响致癌酶的突变分类为RT或EST可能有助于预测肿瘤对抑制药物的敏感性或耐药性。