Doran T, McCann R
Department of Public Health, University of Liverpool.
J Public Health Med. 2001 Dec;23(4):329-34. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.4.329.
General practices undertake annual immunization campaigns to protect susceptible patients against influenza. Many practices, however, do not adopt effective approaches and there is great variation in the immunization rates achieved. This study aimed to assess the attitudes of primary care staff to the annual immunization programme, the obstacles they face, and possible reasons for the wide variation in immunization rates.
A semi-structured questionnaire survey of general practice groups in Salford &Trafford during winter 1997-1998 was carried out, a total of 104 practices.
Respondents perceived influenza vaccine to be effective (93.2 per cent), well received by patients (91.7 per cent) and without significant side-effects (83.6 per cent). The annual immunization programme was seen as being necessary (91.8 per cent), cost-effective (76.7 per cent), reducing hospital admissions (82.2 per cent), but very time consuming (64.4 per cent). Practices were more likely to target patients specified in the Chief Medical Officer's guidelines; however, most (98.6 per cent) targeted the over-75s before their inclusion in the guidelines, and many (61.6 per cent) targeted the over-65s. Practices did not always use the most effective methods of contacting patients, primarily relying on posters (97.3 per cent), opportunistic contacts (95.9 per cent) and reminders on prescriptions (83.6 per cent), rather than letters (39.7 per cent) and telephone calls (11.0 per cent). Practices identified several common obstacles to immunization, relating to the cost and administrative burden of the annual immunization programme, difficulty identifying high-risk patients, and public beliefs about influenza and influenza vaccine.
Although generally positive towards influenza immunization, practice staff differ in their ability to cope with, and the appropriateness of their response to, the pressures of the annual immunization programme. Additional support and co-operation from the Department of Health, Health Authorities and pharmaceutical companies could remove some of the obstacles to immunization of high-risk patients.
普通诊所开展年度免疫接种活动以保护易感患者免受流感侵袭。然而,许多诊所并未采用有效的方法,且所达到的免疫接种率差异很大。本研究旨在评估基层医疗人员对年度免疫接种计划的态度、他们面临的障碍以及免疫接种率差异巨大的可能原因。
在1997 - 1998年冬季对索尔福德和特拉福德的普通诊所组进行了一项半结构化问卷调查,共104家诊所。
受访者认为流感疫苗有效(93.2%)、患者接受度高(91.7%)且无明显副作用(83.6%)。年度免疫接种计划被视为必要(91.8%)、具有成本效益(76.7%)、可减少住院人数(82.2%),但非常耗时(64.4%)。诊所更倾向于针对首席医疗官指南中指定的患者;然而,大多数(98.6%)在指南将75岁以上人群纳入之前就将其作为目标人群,许多(61.6%)还将65岁以上人群作为目标人群。诊所并不总是采用最有效的患者联系方法,主要依赖海报(97.3%)、机会性接触(95.9%)和处方提醒(83.6%),而非信件(39.7%)和电话(11.0%)。诊所确定了免疫接种的几个常见障碍,涉及年度免疫接种计划的成本和行政负担、难以识别高危患者以及公众对流感和流感疫苗的看法。
尽管对流感免疫接种总体持积极态度,但诊所工作人员应对年度免疫接种计划压力的能力以及应对方式的恰当性存在差异。卫生部、卫生当局和制药公司提供更多支持与合作可以消除高危患者免疫接种的一些障碍。