Lahner E, Bordi C, Di Giulio E, Caruana P, D'Ambra G, Milione M, Grossi C, Delle Fave G, Annibale B
Digestive and Liver Disease Unit, 2nd Medical School, University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002 Mar;16(3):507-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2002.01213.x.
It has been reported that 50% of patients with atrophic body gastritis have positive Helicobacter pylori antibody titres only. In atrophic body gastritis, a decrease in H. pylori antibodies after eradication treatment has been reported, suggesting that serology may indicate an active H. pylori infection.
To investigate the time course of H. pylori antibodies and gastric inflammation after eradication treatment in patients with atrophic body gastritis, and to determine whether serology alone can be considered as a valid tool to assess the efficacy of eradication treatment in patients with atrophic body gastritis.
Twenty-seven patients with atrophic body gastritis (12 serologically H. pylori-positive only, ABG-S+; 15 H. pylori-positive at histology and serology, ABG-H+) were included in the treatment group, and 17 patients (all ABG-S+) in the no treatment group. All patients had gastroscopy plus biopsies evaluated according to the updated Sydney system and H. pylori immunoglobulin G determination: in the treatment group, at baseline and 6 and 24 months after eradication (bismuth-based triple regimens); in the no treatment group, at baseline and after 3 years.
In the treatment group, in ABG-S+ patients, H. pylori antibodies decreased significantly 6 months after treatment [37.5 U/mL (16-100 U/mL) vs. 15 U/mL (0--100 U/mL), P < 0.01], but 2 years after treatment no further decrease occurred. In addition, in ABG-H+ patients, a significant decrease in H. pylori antibodies occurred 6 months after treatment [45 U/mL (12.5-100 U/mL) vs. 31 U/mL (0-65 U/mL), P < 0.01], but a further decrease was also observed 2 years after treatment [20 U/mL (0-56 U/mL), P < 0.01]. In ABG-S+ patients, no correlation was observed between the H. pylori antibodies and gastric inflammation score, whereas, in the ABG-H+ group, this correlation was extremely significant (r=0.5991, P < 0.0001). In the no treatment group, at follow-up, a significant decrease in H. pylori antibodies was observed [26 U/mL (15-100 U/mL) vs. 22 U/mL (0-53 U/mL), P < 0.05], but the gastric body inflammation remained unchanged.
This study shows that, in ABG-S+ patients after eradication treatment, serology does not keep in step with gastric inflammation. This suggests that, in patients with atrophic body gastritis, serology alone may not be valid for the assessment of the efficacy of eradication treatment.
据报道,50%的萎缩性胃体炎患者仅幽门螺杆菌抗体滴度呈阳性。在萎缩性胃体炎中,有报道称根除治疗后幽门螺杆菌抗体下降,这表明血清学可能提示幽门螺杆菌的现症感染。
研究萎缩性胃体炎患者根除治疗后幽门螺杆菌抗体和胃内炎症的时间变化过程,并确定血清学单独是否可被视为评估萎缩性胃体炎患者根除治疗疗效的有效工具。
治疗组纳入27例萎缩性胃体炎患者(12例血清学仅幽门螺杆菌阳性,ABG-S+;15例组织学和血清学均幽门螺杆菌阳性,ABG-H+),未治疗组纳入17例患者(均为ABG-S+)。所有患者均接受胃镜检查及活检,并根据更新的悉尼系统进行评估,同时检测幽门螺杆菌免疫球蛋白G:治疗组在基线、根除治疗后6个月和24个月(铋剂三联疗法)进行检测;未治疗组在基线和3年后进行检测。
治疗组中,ABG-S+患者治疗后6个月幽门螺杆菌抗体显著下降[37.5 U/mL(16 - 100 U/mL)对15 U/mL(0 - 100 U/mL),P < 0.01],但治疗2年后未进一步下降。此外,ABG-H+患者治疗后6个月幽门螺杆菌抗体显著下降[45 U/mL(12.5 - 100 U/mL)对31 U/mL(0 - 65 U/mL),P < 0.01],但治疗2年后也进一步下降[20 U/mL(0 - 56 U/mL),P < 0.01]。在ABG-S+患者中,未观察到幽门螺杆菌抗体与胃内炎症评分之间的相关性,而在ABG-H+组中,这种相关性极为显著(r = 0.