Withnell Robert H, Shaffer Lauren A, Lilly David J
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Ear Hear. 2002 Feb;23(1):49-57. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200202000-00004.
The recent report by Peter Dallos and colleagues of the gene and protein responsible for outer hair cell somatic motility (Zheng, Shen, He, Long, Madison, & Dallos, 2000), and the work of James Hudspeth and colleagues demonstrating that vestibular stereocilia are capable of providing power that may boost the vibration of structures within the inner ear (Martin & Hudspeth, 1999), presents the tantalizing possibility that we may not be far away from answering the question what drives mechanical amplification in the mammalian cochlea? This article reviews the evidence for and against each of somatic motility as the motor, and a motor in the hair cell bundle, producing cochlear mechanical amplification. We consider three models based on somatic motility as the motor and two based on a motor in the hair cell bundle. Available evidence supports a hair cell bundle motor in nonmammals but the upper frequency limit of mammalian hearing in general exceeds that of nonmammals, in many cases by an order of magnitude or more. Only time will tell whether an evolutionary dichotomy exists (Manley, Kirk, Köppl, & Yates, 2001).
彼得·达洛斯及其同事最近关于外毛细胞体细胞运动所涉及的基因和蛋白质的报告(郑、沈、何、龙、麦迪逊和达洛斯,2000年),以及詹姆斯·哈德斯佩斯及其同事的研究工作,证明前庭静纤毛能够提供能量,可能增强内耳结构的振动(马丁和哈德斯佩斯,1999年),这提示了一种诱人的可能性,即我们可能离回答是什么驱动哺乳动物耳蜗中的机械放大这个问题不远了。本文回顾了支持和反对体细胞运动作为驱动者以及毛细胞束中存在驱动者从而产生耳蜗机械放大的证据。我们考虑了三种基于体细胞运动作为驱动者的模型和两种基于毛细胞束中存在驱动者的模型。现有证据支持非哺乳动物中存在毛细胞束驱动者,但一般来说,哺乳动物听力的高频极限超过非哺乳动物,在许多情况下超出一个数量级或更多。只有时间能告诉我们是否存在进化上的二分法(曼利、柯克、克普尔和耶茨,2001年)。