Harris David, McCulloch Audrey I, Kendall David A, Randall Michael D
School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
J Physiol. 2002 Mar 15;539(Pt 3):893-902. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.013489.
The endogenous cannabinoid anandamide has recently been identified as a vasorelaxant but the underlying mechanisms are controversial. The vasorelaxant responses to anandamide have now been examined in the rat mesenteric arterial bed. Anandamide caused potent vasorelaxations (pD(2) = 6.24 +/- 0.06; R(max) = 89.4 +/- 2.2 %) which were unaffected by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 300 microM). The responses were also predominantly endothelium independent and were unaffected by the cannabinoid CB(1) receptor antagonist SR141716A (1 microM), although at higher concentrations (3 and 10 microM) SR141716A was inhibitory. Both 1 mM ouabain (pD(2) = 5.90 +/- 0.07; R(max) = 50.4 +/- 6.5 %) and 100 microM 18alpha-glycyrrhetinic acid (pD(2) = 6.04 +/- 0.14; R(max) = 40.9 +/- 5.8 %) opposed anandamide-induced vasorelaxation. However, the gap junction inhibitors carbenoxolone (100 microM) and palmitoleic acid (50 microM) did not affect vasorelaxation to anandamide. Relaxation to anandamide was significantly attenuated by both capsaicin pretreatment to deplete the sensory nerves of neurotransmitters (pD(2) = 5.86 +/- 0.18; R(max) = 56.3 +/- 5.2 %) and the vanilloid antagonist ruthenium red (10 microM; pD(2) = 5.64 +/- 0.09; R(max) = 33.7 +/- 3.9 %). However, these inhibitory effects were prevented by the additional presence of L-NAME, when the relaxation to anandamide was unaffected (pD(2) = 6.19 +/- 0.07; R(max) = 81.9 +/- 2.8 %). The inhibitor of neuronal nitric oxide synthase, 7-nitroindazole, also prevented capsaicin from inhibiting the responses to anandamide. The results of this study point to anandamide acting via several mechanisms, which include the involvement of sensory nerves, but only in the presence of nitric oxide.
内源性大麻素花生四烯乙醇胺最近被确定为一种血管舒张剂,但其潜在机制仍存在争议。目前已在大鼠肠系膜动脉床中研究了对花生四烯乙醇胺的血管舒张反应。花生四烯乙醇胺引起强烈的血管舒张作用(pD(2)=6.24±0.06;R(max)=89.4±2.2%),用N(G)-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME;300 microM)抑制一氧化氮合酶对此无影响。这些反应也主要不依赖于内皮,并且不受大麻素CB(1)受体拮抗剂SR141716A(1 microM)的影响,尽管在较高浓度(3和10 microM)时SR141716A具有抑制作用。1 mM哇巴因(pD(2)=5.90±0.07;R(max)=50.4±6.5%)和100 microM 18α-甘草次酸(pD(2)=6.04±0.14;R(max)=40.9±5.8%)均对抗花生四烯乙醇胺诱导的血管舒张。然而,缝隙连接抑制剂羧苄青霉素(100 microM)和棕榈油酸(50 microM)并不影响对花生四烯乙醇胺的血管舒张。辣椒素预处理使感觉神经递质耗竭后(pD(2)=5.86±0.18;R(max)=56.3±5.2%)以及香草酸拮抗剂钌红(10 microM;pD(2)=5.64±0.09;R(max)=33.7±3.9%)均使对花生四烯乙醇胺的舒张作用显著减弱。然而,当存在L-NAME时,这些抑制作用被阻止,此时对花生四烯乙醇胺的舒张作用不受影响(pD(2)=6.19±0.07;R(max)=81.9±2.8%)。神经元型一氧化氮合酶抑制剂7-硝基吲唑也能阻止辣椒素抑制对花生四烯乙醇胺的反应。本研究结果表明花生四烯乙醇胺通过多种机制发挥作用,其中包括感觉神经的参与,但仅在一氧化氮存在的情况下。