Facchinetti F, Sgarbi L, Piccinini F, Volpe A
Departments of Gynecological, Obstetrics and Pediatric Sciences, Unit of Psychobiology of Reproduction, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002 Feb;16(1):39-43.
Primary dysmenorrhea is a syndrome characterized by painful uterine contractility caused by a hypersecretion of endometrial prostaglandins; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the first choice for its treatment. However, in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that myometrial cells are also targets of the relaxant effects of nitric oxide (NO). The aim of the present study was to determine the efficacy of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), an NO donor, in the resolution of primary dysmenorrhea in comparison with diclofenac (DCF). A total of 24 patients with the diagnosis of severe primary dysmenorrhea were studied during two consecutive menstrual cycles. In an open, cross-over, controlled design, patients were randomized to receive either DCF per os or GTN patches the first days of menses, when menstrual cramps became unendurable. In the subsequent cycle the other treatment was used. Patients received up to 3 doses/day of 50 mg DCF or 2.5 mg/24 h transdermal GTN for the first 3 days of the cycle, according to their needs. The participants recorded menstrual symptoms and possible side-effects at different times (0, 30, 60, 120 minutes) after the first dose of medication on the first day of the cycle, with both drugs. The difference in pain intensity score (DPI) was the main outcome variable. Both treatments significantly reduced DPI by the 30th minute (GTN, -12.8 +/- 17.9; DCF, -18.9 +/- 16.6). However, DCF continued to be effective in reducing pelvic pain for two hours, whereas GTN scores remained more or less stable after 30 min and significantly higher than those for DFC (after one hour: GTN, -12.8 +/- 17.9; DFC, -18.9 +/- 16.6 and after two hours: GTN, -23.7 +/- 20.5; DFC, -59.7 +/- 17.9, p = 0.0001). Low back pain was also relieved by both drugs. Headache was significantly increased by GTN but not by DCF. Eight patients stopped using GTN because headache--attributed to its use--became intolerable. These findings indicate that GTN has a reduced efficacy and tolerability by comparison with DCF in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
原发性痛经是一种由子宫内膜前列腺素分泌过多引起子宫收缩疼痛的综合征;非甾体类抗炎药是其治疗的首选药物。然而,体内和体外研究表明,肌层细胞也是一氧化氮(NO)舒张作用的靶点。本研究的目的是比较NO供体硝酸甘油(GTN)与双氯芬酸(DCF)在缓解原发性痛经方面的疗效。在两个连续的月经周期中,对24例诊断为重度原发性痛经的患者进行了研究。采用开放、交叉、对照设计,患者在月经来潮、痛经难以忍受的头几天被随机分为口服DCF组或使用GTN贴片组。在随后的周期中使用另一种治疗方法。根据患者的需要,在周期的前3天,患者每天最多服用3剂50mg的DCF或2.5mg/24h的透皮GTN。参与者在服用两种药物后,于周期第一天首次服药后的不同时间(0、30、60、120分钟)记录月经症状和可能的副作用。疼痛强度评分差异(DPI)是主要的观察变量。两种治疗方法在第30分钟时均显著降低了DPI(GTN,-12.8±17.9;DCF,-18.9±16.6)。然而,DCF在两小时内持续有效地减轻盆腔疼痛,而GTN评分在30分钟后基本保持稳定,且显著高于DCF的评分(一小时后:GTN,-12.8±17.9;DFC,-18.9±16.6;两小时后:GTN,-23.7±20.5;DFC,-59.7±17.9,p=0.0001)。两种药物也都缓解了腰痛。GTN显著增加了头痛,但DCF没有。8名患者因使用GTN导致的头痛变得无法忍受而停止使用。这些发现表明,与DCF相比,GTN在治疗原发性痛经方面疗效和耐受性较低。