Brown Nigel A
Department of Anatomy & Developmental Biology, St George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, UK.
Altern Lab Anim. 2002 Mar-Apr;30(2):177-98. doi: 10.1177/026119290203000205.
The European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) has sponsored a large international prevalidation and validation study of three embryotoxicity tests, involving embryonic stem cells, limb bud micromass cultures, and post-implantation whole-embryo cultures. The main objective of the study was to assess the performance of these in vitro tests in discriminating between non-embryotoxic, weakly embryotoxic and strongly embryotoxic compounds. An initial part of the study was to select 20 test substances for the formal validation trial, conducted under blind conditions. A database of in vivo and in vitro developmental toxicity test results was complied on 310 chemicals that had been used in previous validation studies, or suggested for such use, or that had good quality "segment II"-type in vivo data, or for which there were human data. From this database, a shortlist of about 30 candidates was constructed. Because the ECVAM study would not include metabolic activation, chemicals known to require activation for their developmental effects were excluded as candidates, although some known stable metabolites were included. Attempts were made: to include substances of diverse mechanism; to avoid overemphasis on pharmaceuticals; to avoid biologically inert substances as non-embryotoxicants; and to make the list different from those used previously. The candidates were of three categories: Class 3, strongly embryotoxic, was defined as developmentally toxic in all species tested, inducing multiple developmental effects, and with a high A/D ratio. Class 1, non-embryotoxic, was defined as not developmentally toxic at maternally toxic exposures, but which may show some minor embryo/fetal toxicity, which cannot be separated from maternal toxicity. Class 2, weakly embryotoxic, were chemicals of intermediate activity. From this candidate list, chemicals of known receptor (androgen, oestrogen, glucocorticoid, aryl hydrocarbon) mechanisms were excluded, on the basis that simple tests for such activity are already available. In addition, chemicals not freely available were excluded, and an emphasis on human data was applied. The final list of 20 chemicals was: Class 3--6-aminonicotinamide, 5-bromo- 2'-deoxyuridine, hydroxyurea, methylmercury chloride, methotrexate, all-trans-retinoic acid; Class 2--boric acid, dimethadione, lithium chloride, methoxyacetic acid, valproic acid (VPA), 2-propyl-4-pentynoic acid (4-yn-VPA), salicylic acid sodium salt; and Class 1--acrylamide, D-(+)-camphor, dimethyl phthalate, diphenhydramine hydrochloride, 2-ethyl-4- methylpentanoic acid (isobutyl-ethyl-VPA), Penicillin G sodium salt, saccharin sodium hydrate.
欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)发起了一项针对三种胚胎毒性试验的大型国际预验证和验证研究,这三种试验分别涉及胚胎干细胞、肢芽微团培养和植入后全胚胎培养。该研究的主要目的是评估这些体外试验在区分非胚胎毒性、弱胚胎毒性和强胚胎毒性化合物方面的性能。研究的初始部分是选择20种受试物质用于在盲法条件下进行的正式验证试验。建立了一个关于体内和体外发育毒性试验结果的数据库,该数据库涵盖了310种化学物质,这些化学物质曾用于以往的验证研究、被建议用于此类研究、具有高质量的“第二阶段”类型的体内数据或有人类数据。从这个数据库中,构建了一份约30个候选物质的入围名单。由于ECVAM的研究不包括代谢活化,已知其发育效应需要活化的化学物质被排除在候选名单之外,不过一些已知的稳定代谢物被纳入其中。研究人员进行了如下尝试:纳入具有不同作用机制的物质;避免过度强调药物;避免将生物惰性物质作为非胚胎毒性物质;使该名单与以往使用的名单不同。候选物质分为三类:第3类,强胚胎毒性,定义为在所有受试物种中均具有发育毒性,可诱导多种发育效应,且A/D比值高。第1类,非胚胎毒性,定义为在母体毒性暴露水平下无发育毒性,但可能表现出一些轻微的胚胎/胎儿毒性,且无法与母体毒性区分开来。第2类,弱胚胎毒性,是活性中等的化学物质。从这份候选名单中,已知受体(雄激素、雌激素、糖皮质激素、芳烃)作用机制的化学物质被排除,理由是已有针对此类活性的简单试验。此外,无法自由获取的化学物质被排除,并重点考虑了人类数据。最终的20种化学物质名单如下:第3类——6 - 氨基烟酰胺、5 - 溴 - 2'-脱氧尿苷、羟基脲、甲基氯化汞、甲氨蝶呤、全反式视黄酸;第2类——硼酸、二甲双酮、氯化锂、甲氧基乙酸、丙戊酸(VPA)、2 - 丙基 - 4 - 戊炔酸(4 - 炔 - VPA)、水杨酸钠盐;第1类——丙烯酰胺、D -(+)-樟脑、邻苯二甲酸二甲酯、盐酸苯海拉明、2 - 乙基 - 4 - 甲基戊酸(异丁基 - 乙基 - VPA)、青霉素G钠盐、糖精钠水合物。