Grembowski David E, Martin Diane, Patrick Donald L, Diehr Paula, Katon Wayne, Williams Barbara, Engelberg Ruth, Novak Louise, Dickstein Deborah, Deyo Richard, Goldberg Harold I
Center for Cost and Outcomes Research, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash 98195-7660, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):258-69. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10321.x.
To determine whether managed care is associated with reduced access to mental health specialists and worse outcomes among primary care patients with depressive symptoms.
Prospective cohort study.
Offices of 261 primary physicians in private practice in Seattle.
Patients (N = 17,187) were screened in waiting rooms, enrolling 1,336 adults with depressive symptoms. Patients (n = 942) completed follow-up surveys at 1, 3, and 6 months.
For each patient, the intensity of managed care was measured by the managedness of the patient's health plan, plan benefit indexes, presence or absence of a mental health carve-out, intensity of managed care in the patient's primary care office, physician financial incentives, and whether the physician read or used depression guidelines. Access measures were referral and actually seeing a mental health specialist. Outcomes were the Symptom Checklist for Depression, restricted activity days, and patient rating of care from primary physician. Approximately 23% of patients were referred to mental health specialists, and 38% saw a mental health specialist with or without referral. Managed care generally was not associated with a reduced likelihood of referral or seeing a mental health specialist. Patients in more-managed plans were less likely to be referred to a psychiatrist. Among low-income patients, a physician financial withhold for referral was associated with fewer mental health referrals. A physician productivity bonus was associated with greater access to mental health specialists. Depressive symptom and restricted activity day outcomes in more-managed health plans and offices were similar to or better than less-managed settings. Patients in more-managed offices had lower ratings of care from their primary physicians.
The intensity of managed care was generally not associated with access to mental health specialists. The small number of managed care strategies associated with reduced access were offset by other strategies associated with increased access. Consequently, no adverse health outcomes were detected, but lower patient ratings of care provided by their primary physicians were found.
确定管理式医疗是否与初级保健中患有抑郁症状的患者获得心理健康专家服务的机会减少及预后较差相关。
前瞻性队列研究。
西雅图261名私人执业初级医师的办公室。
在候诊室对患者(N = 17,187)进行筛查,招募了1336名有抑郁症状的成年人。942名患者在1、3和6个月时完成了随访调查。
对于每位患者,管理式医疗的强度通过患者健康计划的管理程度、计划福利指数、是否有心理健康专项保障、患者初级保健办公室的管理式医疗强度、医师经济激励措施以及医师是否阅读或使用抑郁症指南来衡量。获得服务的指标是转诊和实际就诊于心理健康专家。预后指标是抑郁症状清单、活动受限天数以及患者对初级医师提供的护理的评分。约23%的患者被转诊至心理健康专家,38%的患者无论是否转诊都就诊于心理健康专家。管理式医疗总体上与转诊或就诊于心理健康专家的可能性降低无关。参保管理程度更高的计划的患者被转诊至精神科医生的可能性较小。在低收入患者中,医师因转诊而被扣留资金与心理健康转诊减少有关。医师生产率奖金与获得心理健康专家服务的机会增加有关。参保管理程度更高的健康计划和办公室中的抑郁症状和活动受限天数预后与参保管理程度较低者相似或更好。参保管理程度更高的办公室中的患者对其初级医师提供的护理评分较低。
管理式医疗的强度总体上与获得心理健康专家服务的机会无关。与获得服务机会减少相关的管理式医疗策略数量较少,被其他与获得服务机会增加相关的策略所抵消。因此,未检测到不良健康预后,但发现患者对其初级医师提供的护理评分较低。