Wentink M, Jakimowicz J J, Vos L M, Meijer D W, Wieringa P A
OCP-Man Machine Systems, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628CD, Delft, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2002 Aug;16(8):1237-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9127-1. Epub 2002 May 3.
Compared to open surgery, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) relies heavily on advanced technology, such as endoscopic viewing systems and innovative instruments. The aim of the study was to objectively compare three technologically advanced laparoscopic viewing systems with the standard viewing system currently used in most Dutch hospitals.
We evaluated the following advanced laparoscopic viewing systems: a Thin Film Transistor (TFT) display, a stereo endoscope, and an image projection display. The standard viewing system was comprised of a monocular endoscope and a high-resolution monitor. Task completion time served as the measure of performance. Eight surgeons with laparoscopic experience participated in the experiment.
The average task time was significantly greater (p <0.05) with the stereo viewing system than with the standard viewing system. The average task times with the TFT display and the image projection display did not differ significantly from the standard viewing system.
Although the stereo viewing system promises improved depth perception and the TFT and image projection displays are supposed to improve hand-eye coordination, none of these systems provided better task performance than the standard viewing system in this pelvi-trainer experiment.
与开放手术相比,微创手术(MIS)严重依赖先进技术,如内窥镜观察系统和创新器械。本研究的目的是客观比较三种技术先进的腹腔镜观察系统与目前荷兰大多数医院使用的标准观察系统。
我们评估了以下先进的腹腔镜观察系统:薄膜晶体管(TFT)显示器、立体内窥镜和图像投影显示器。标准观察系统由单目内窥镜和高分辨率监视器组成。任务完成时间作为性能指标。八位有腹腔镜经验的外科医生参与了实验。
立体观察系统的平均任务时间显著长于(p<0.05)标准观察系统。TFT显示器和图像投影显示器的平均任务时间与标准观察系统无显著差异。
尽管立体观察系统有望改善深度感知,TFT和图像投影显示器应能改善手眼协调,但在本骨盆训练器实验中,这些系统均未提供比标准观察系统更好的任务表现。