Petkova Eva, Teresi Jeanne
New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, Department of Biostatistics, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):531-47. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200205000-00018.
This article discusses broad statistical issues common to much medical research: intent-to-treat analysis vs. completers analysis; clustered hierarchical and repeated-measures data; missing data and dropouts; and assessment of direct, indirect, and total effects. Traditional approaches and statistical techniques are reviewed and contrasted with modern methods for analysis of medical studies.
The concepts are introduced and discussed in general terms; they are illustrated with an example. The example comes from a study of the effect of residence in special care units (SCUs) for demented elderly on the daily function of nursing homes residents. More than 700 residents from 22 nursing facilities, residing in either an SCU or a non-SCU were assessed three times at approximate 6-month intervals.
Results from both the application of traditional statistical techniques and modern methods for the analysis of repeated-measures of hierarchical multicenter data are presented, interpreted, and compared. Advantages and shortcomings of these approaches are discussed.
This article advocates the use of mixed models and proper causal reasoning and terminology in the analysis and publication of results from studies on aging and life course.
本文讨论了许多医学研究中常见的广泛统计问题:意向性分析与完成者分析;聚类分层和重复测量数据;缺失数据和退出研究的情况;以及直接、间接和总效应的评估。对传统方法和统计技术进行了回顾,并与医学研究分析的现代方法进行了对比。
以一般术语介绍和讨论这些概念,并通过一个例子进行说明。该例子来自一项关于痴呆老年人居住在特殊护理单元(SCU)对养老院居民日常功能影响的研究。来自22个护理机构的700多名居民,居住在SCU或非SCU中,每隔大约6个月进行三次评估。
展示、解释并比较了传统统计技术和现代方法在分层多中心数据重复测量分析中的应用结果。讨论了这些方法的优点和缺点。
本文提倡在衰老和生命历程研究结果的分析和发表中使用混合模型以及适当的因果推理和术语。