Van Wyhe John
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Cambridge, UK.
Br J Hist Sci. 2002 Mar;35(124 Pt 1):17-42. doi: 10.1017/s0007087401004599.
This essay is the first account in English to examine Franz Joseph Gall and the origins of phrenology. In doing so a host of legends about Gall and the beginnings of phrenology, which exist only in the English-language historiography, are dispelled. An understanding of the context of phrenology's origins is essential to to the historicization of the movement as a whole. The first of two sections in the essay, therefore, introduces Gall's biography and the context in which his provocative science emerged. It is shown to what extent Gall borrowed from other thinkers of his time. I show that Gall's system was meant to be a certain science of human nature. In the second section I analyse the reactions of contemporaries to Gall's important two-year lecture tour of Europe. I conclude that although many critics dismissed Gall as a charlatan, there was no consensus about the proper way to disseminate scientific knowledge or the attributes necessary for the gentleman of science. For example, it was not clear whether science could be profitable, whether it should be shared with lay audiences or whether it could in fact be science at all if it was also entertaining. I argue that in any case Gall's aim was never really to impart science or to disseminate his system. His science and early means of disseminating it were meant to generate elite intellectual status. In this Gall was quite successful.
本文是首篇用英文考察弗朗茨·约瑟夫·加尔及颅相学起源的文章。通过这样做,一系列仅存在于英文史学著作中的关于加尔和颅相学起源的传说被破除了。理解颅相学起源的背景对于将该运动作为一个整体进行历史化至关重要。因此,本文的两个章节中的第一章介绍了加尔的生平以及他那具有煽动性的科学得以出现的背景。文中展示了加尔在多大程度上借鉴了他那个时代的其他思想家的观点。我指出加尔的体系旨在成为一门关于人性的特定科学。在第二章中,我分析了同时代人对加尔在欧洲为期两年的重要巡回演讲的反应。我的结论是,尽管许多批评者将加尔斥为江湖骗子,但对于传播科学知识的恰当方式或科学绅士所需具备的特质,并没有达成共识。例如,尚不清楚科学是否可以盈利,是否应该与普通受众分享,或者如果它具有娱乐性的话,它实际上是否还能算是科学。我认为,无论如何,加尔的目的从来都不是真正地传授科学或传播他的体系。他的科学以及早期传播它的方式旨在获得精英知识分子的地位。在这方面加尔相当成功。