Oie Kelvin S, Kiemel Tim, Jeka John J
Program in Neuroscience and Cognitive Science and the Department of Kinesiology, 2242 Health and Human Performance Bldg, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-2611, USA.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Jun;14(1):164-76. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00071-x.
We examined the generally held belief that the postural control system is able to re-weight its available sensory inputs in order to optimize stance control in altered sensory environments. Our view is that previous accounts of sensory re-weighting provide only indirect evidence, which is subject to alternative explanations. The present results provide strong evidence for sensory re-weighting as the primary mechanism for changes observed in postural sway between conditions. Subjects were presented with small-amplitude, oscillatory visual and somatosensory stimuli at 0.20 and 0.28 Hz, respectively, in five conditions that manipulated the amplitudes of stimulus motion. Gain calculated in each trial with respect to each of the two stimuli was found to change systematically as stimulus motion amplitudes changed across condition. The observed pattern of gain rules out a constant-weight, linear account of posture and is consistent with the re-weighting hypothesis. Parameter fits of a third-order, linear stochastic model to postural sway trajectories in each condition showed that changes in gain across condition were primarily due to changes in coupling coefficients rather than changes in parameters that characterize the stability of the postural system. Visual gain was found to depend upon visual motion amplitude and touch gain was found to depend upon touch motion amplitude, indicating intra-modality dependencies. Visual gain also depended upon touch motion amplitude, indicating an inter-modality dependence. To our knowledge, simultaneous re-weighting of more than one sensory input has never been rigorously demonstrated. These techniques may be able to resolve the source of balance control deficits across populations with far more certainty than currently possible.
我们研究了一种普遍持有的观点,即姿势控制系统能够重新权衡其可用的感觉输入,以便在改变的感觉环境中优化姿势控制。我们认为,先前关于感觉重新权衡的描述仅提供了间接证据,而这些证据可能有其他解释。目前的结果为感觉重新权衡提供了有力证据,表明其是不同条件下姿势摆动变化的主要机制。在五种操纵刺激运动幅度的条件下,分别以0.20赫兹和0.28赫兹向受试者呈现小幅度的振荡视觉和体感刺激。发现在每个试验中针对两种刺激中的每一种计算的增益随着刺激运动幅度在不同条件下的变化而系统地改变。观察到的增益模式排除了对姿势的恒定权重线性解释,并且与重新权衡假设一致。在每种条件下,将三阶线性随机模型拟合到姿势摆动轨迹,结果表明不同条件下增益的变化主要是由于耦合系数的变化,而不是表征姿势系统稳定性的参数的变化。发现视觉增益取决于视觉运动幅度,触觉增益取决于触觉运动幅度,这表明了模态内依赖性。视觉增益还取决于触觉运动幅度,这表明了模态间依赖性。据我们所知,从未严格证明过对不止一种感觉输入的同时重新权衡。这些技术或许能够比目前更确定地解析不同人群平衡控制缺陷的根源。