Suppr超能文献

严重术中问题——对83844例麻醉的五年回顾

Serious intraoperative problems--a five-year review of 83,844 anesthetics.

作者信息

Fasting Sigurd, Gisvold Sven E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, St. Olav's Hospital, University Hospital of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2002 Jun-Jul;49(6):545-53. doi: 10.1007/BF03017379.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The low incidence of mortality and major morbidity in anesthesia makes it difficult to study the pattern of potential accidents and to develop preventive strategies. Anesthetic 'near-misses', however, occur more frequently. Using data from a simple routine-based system of problem reporting, we have analyzed the pattern and causes of serious non-fatal problems, in order to improve preventive strategies.

METHODS

We prospectively recorded anesthesia-related information from all anesthetics for five years. The data included intraoperative problems, which were graded into four levels, according to severity. We analyzed only the serious nonfatal problems, which were sorted according to clinical presentation, and also according to which factor was most important in the development of the problem. We assessed any untoward consequences for the patient, and whether the problems could have been prevented.

RESULTS

Serious problems were recorded in 315 cases out of 83,844 (0.4%). Anesthesia was considered the major contributing factor in 111 cases. Difficult intubation, difficult emergence from general anesthesia, allergic reactions, arrhythmia and hypotension were the dominating problems. Twenty-six anesthesia related problems resulted in changes in level of postoperative care, and one patient later died in the intensive care unit after anaphylactic shock. Eighty-two problems could have been prevented by simple strategies.

CONCLUSION

Analysis of serious nonfatal problems during anesthesia may contribute to improved preventive strategies. Data from a routine-based system are suitable for this type of analysis. Intubation, emergence, arrhythmia, hypotension and anaphylaxis cause most serious problems, and should be the object of preventive strategies.

摘要

目的

麻醉中死亡率和严重并发症的发生率较低,这使得研究潜在事故模式和制定预防策略变得困难。然而,麻醉“险些发生的失误”却更为常见。利用一个基于简单常规问题报告系统的数据,我们分析了严重非致命问题的模式和原因,以改进预防策略。

方法

我们前瞻性地记录了五年内所有麻醉的相关信息。数据包括术中问题,根据严重程度分为四个等级。我们仅分析严重非致命问题,这些问题根据临床表现进行分类,同时也根据问题发生过程中最重要的因素进行分类。我们评估了对患者的任何不良后果,以及这些问题是否可以预防。

结果

在83844例中,有315例记录了严重问题(0.4%)。111例中麻醉被认为是主要促成因素。困难插管、全身麻醉后苏醒困难、过敏反应、心律失常和低血压是主要问题。26例与麻醉相关的问题导致术后护理级别改变,1例患者在过敏性休克后于重症监护病房死亡。82个问题可以通过简单策略预防。

结论

分析麻醉期间的严重非致命问题可能有助于改进预防策略。基于常规系统的数据适用于此类分析。插管、苏醒、心律失常、低血压和过敏反应导致了大多数严重问题,应成为预防策略的对象。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验