Gotzsche P C, Johansen H K
The Nordic Cochrane Centre, Rigshospitalet, Dept. 7112, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark, 2200.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD000026. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000026.
Systemic fungal infection is considered to be an important cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, particularly those with neutropenia. Antifungal drugs are often given prophylactically, or to patients with persistent fever.
The objective of this review was to assess the effect of antifungal drugs in cancer patients with neutropenia.
We searched the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and MEDLINE (November 2001) and the reference lists of articles. We searched the proceedings of the ICAAC (from 1990 to 2001, General Meeting of the ASM (from 1990 to 2001), and the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (1995 to 2001) and contacted researchers in the field.
Randomised trials of amphotericin B, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, or itraconazole compared with placebo or no treatment in cancer patients with neutropenia.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality and abstracted data.
Thirty trials involving 4094 patients were included. Prophylactic or empirical treatment with antifungals as a group had no statistically significant effect on mortality (relative risk 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.11). The relative risk was smallest for amphotericin B, 0.73 (0.52 to 1.03) (P=0.08). In another review, three trials compared intravenous lipid soluble amphotericin B (AmBisome) with smaller doses of standard intravenous amphotericin B; the relative risk was 0.74 (0.52 to 1.07). Taken together, these results indicate that intravenous amphotericin B might decrease mortality. In contrast, trials with fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole and itraconazole failed to find an effect on mortality. The incidence of invasive fungal infection decreased significantly with administration of amphotericin B (relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.76), fluconazole (0.39, 0.27 to 0.57) and itraconazole (0.51, 0.27 to 0.96), but not with miconazole or ketoconazole.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous amphotericin B is the only antifungal agent for which there is evidence suggesting that it might reduce mortality. It should therefore be preferred when prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapy in cancer patients with neutropenia is considered indicated.
系统性真菌感染被认为是癌症患者发病和死亡的重要原因,尤其是那些中性粒细胞减少的患者。抗真菌药物通常用于预防性给药,或用于持续发热的患者。
本综述的目的是评估抗真菌药物对中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者的疗效。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验注册库、MEDLINE(2001年11月)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们检索了美国微生物学会年会(1990年至2001年)、美国传染病学会年会(1990年至2001年)以及欧洲临床微生物学和传染病大会(1995年至2001年)的会议记录,并联系了该领域的研究人员。
在中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者中,将两性霉素B、氟康唑、酮康唑、咪康唑或伊曲康唑与安慰剂或不治疗进行比较的随机试验。
两名评价员独立评估试验的合格性、方法学质量并提取数据。
纳入了30项试验,涉及4094名患者。作为一个整体,抗真菌药物的预防性或经验性治疗对死亡率没有统计学上的显著影响(相对危险度0.95,95%可信区间0.82至1.11)。两性霉素B的相对危险度最小,为0.73(0.52至1.03)(P=0.08)。在另一项综述中,三项试验比较了静脉注射脂质体两性霉素B(安必素)与小剂量标准静脉注射两性霉素B;相对危险度为0.74(0.52至1.07)。综合来看,这些结果表明静脉注射两性霉素B可能会降低死亡率。相比之下,氟康唑、酮康唑、咪康唑和伊曲康唑的试验未能发现对死亡率有影响。两性霉素B(相对危险度0.39,95%可信区间0.20至0.76)、氟康唑(0.39,0.27至0.57)和伊曲康唑(0.51,0.27至0.96)给药后侵袭性真菌感染的发生率显著降低,但咪康唑或酮康唑则不然。
静脉注射两性霉素B是唯一有证据表明可能降低死亡率的抗真菌药物。因此,在考虑对中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者进行预防性或经验性抗真菌治疗时,应优先选择该药。