Liang B A
Southern Illinois University School of Law and School of Medicine, 1150 Douglas Drive, Carbondale, IL 62901-6804, USA.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Mar;11(1):64-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.64.
External mandates for medical error disclosure are often justified by potential cost savings, the belief in individual moral obligations in health care, and the concept that patients have rights and providers have responsibilities. Such an approach does not recognise the systems nature of error and outcomes and the important quality role disclosure can play in a system of medical error disclosure. Systems concepts, the patient-provider partnership, and overall quality of care can be enhanced using a system of disclosure that provides for education about the systems nature of error, fulfills the delivery system philosophy of mutual respect, and integrates the patient and his/her family as a partner in the error reduction enterprise. Such a system can result using clear disclosure policies and procedures sensitive to patient and family needs, open communications with concerned, committed, and compassionate system representatives, and use of mediation methods that foster communication, allow for venting, and are flexible in their approach to resolving conflict, including using apology. Although a system may also result in conflict resolution costs, more importantly it may foster and solidify a team approach to reducing errors and promoting patient safety.
医疗差错披露的外部要求通常基于潜在的成本节约、对医疗保健中个人道德义务的信念,以及患者有权利而医疗服务提供者有责任这一概念。这种方法没有认识到差错和结果的系统性本质,以及披露在医疗差错披露系统中可以发挥的重要质量作用。通过一个披露系统,可以增强系统概念、医患伙伴关系以及整体医疗质量,该系统能够提供关于差错系统性本质的教育,践行相互尊重的医疗服务体系理念,并将患者及其家属纳入减少差错的工作中,使其成为合作伙伴。通过制定对患者和家属需求敏感的明确披露政策和程序、与关心患者、尽职尽责且富有同情心的系统代表进行开放沟通,以及使用促进沟通、允许发泄情绪且在解决冲突方法上灵活多样(包括使用道歉)的调解方法,可以形成这样一个系统。尽管这样一个系统可能也会产生冲突解决成本,但更重要的是,它可能会促进并巩固一种团队方法,以减少差错并促进患者安全。