Suppr超能文献

高危患者非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术有效性的评估:一项观察性研究。

Evaluation of the effectiveness of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients: an observational study.

作者信息

Chamberlain Martin H, Ascione Raimondo, Reeves Barnaby C, Angelini Gianni D

机构信息

Bristol Heart Institute, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Jun;73(6):1866-73. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)03550-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients carries substantial morbidity. We compared the effectiveness of off-pump revascularization with that of conventional coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest in consecutive high-risk patients.

METHODS

From April 1996 to December 2000, clinical data for consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization were prospectively entered into a database. Data were extracted for all patients considered to be high risk, defined as the presence of one or more of ten adverse prognostic factors. Hospital mortality and early morbidity were compared between two groups of patients, the on-pump and off-pump groups.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 1,570 consecutive high-risk patients, 332 (21.1%) of whom underwent an off-pump operation. Patients in the on-pump group had fewer high-risk factors and lower Parsonnet scores and were less likely to be 75 years of age or older, to have peripheral vascular disease or hypercholesterolemia, or to have sustained a previous transient ischemic attack. However, they were more likely to be assigned to a higher Canadian Cardiovascular Society class and had more extensive coronary artery disease and were more likely to have unstable angina, to require urgent or emergency operations, and to receive more grafts than those undergoing off-pump procedures. Unadjusted odds ratios for intensive care unit or high-dependency unit stay, total length of stay, blood loss of more than 1,000 mL, postoperative hemoglobin and transfusion requirement all showed a highly significant benefit for the off-pump group (p < or = 0.005; odds ratios, 0.33 to 0.65). After adjustment for prognostic variables, odds ratios remained essentially unaltered (adjusted odds ratio estimates 0.36 to p < 0.05) except for blood loss of more than 1,000 mL (adjusted odds ratio estimate, 0.82; p = 0.22). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting is safe, effective, and associated with reduced morbidity in high-risk patients compared with conventional coronary artery revascularization.

摘要

背景

高危患者的冠状动脉搭桥手术具有较高的发病率。我们比较了非体外循环血管重建术与传统冠状动脉搭桥术(使用体外循环和心脏停搏)在连续高危患者中的有效性。

方法

从1996年4月至2000年12月,将连续接受冠状动脉血管重建术患者的临床数据前瞻性地录入数据库。提取所有被认为是高危患者的数据,高危定义为存在十种不良预后因素中的一种或多种。比较了两组患者(体外循环组和非体外循环组)的医院死亡率和早期发病率。

结果

研究组包括1570例连续的高危患者,其中332例(21.1%)接受了非体外循环手术。体外循环组患者的高危因素较少,Parsonnet评分较低,且年龄在75岁及以上、患有外周血管疾病或高胆固醇血症、或曾发生过短暂性脑缺血发作的可能性较小。然而,与接受非体外循环手术的患者相比,他们更有可能被归类为加拿大心血管学会较高等级,冠状动脉疾病更广泛,更有可能患有不稳定型心绞痛,需要紧急或急诊手术,并且接受的移植血管更多。重症监护病房或高依赖病房住院时间、总住院时间、失血超过1000 mL、术后血红蛋白和输血需求的未调整比值比均显示非体外循环组具有显著优势(p≤0.005;比值比为0.33至0.65)。在对预后变量进行调整后,除失血超过1000 mL外(调整后的比值比估计为0.82;p = 0.22),比值比基本保持不变(调整后的比值比估计为0.36至p < 0.05)。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。

结论

与传统冠状动脉血管重建术相比,非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术在高危患者中是安全、有效的,且发病率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验