Chen Jen-I, Ha Brian, Bushnell M Catherine, Pike Bruce, Duncan Gary H
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Graduate Studies & Research, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 2B4, Canada.
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Jul;88(1):464-74. doi: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.1.464.
The role of the somatosensory cortices (SI and SII) in pain perception has long been in dispute. Human imaging studies demonstrate activation of SI and SII associated with painful stimuli, but results have been variable, and the functional relevance of any such activation is uncertain. The present study addresses this issue by testing whether the time course of somatosensory activation, evoked by painful heat and nonpainful tactile stimuli, is sufficient to discriminate temporal differences that characterize the perception of these stimulus modalities. Four normal subjects each participated in three functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions, in which painful (noxious heat 45-46 degrees C) and nonpainful test stimuli (brushing at 2 Hz) were applied repeatedly (9-s stimulus duration) to the left leg in separate experiments. Activation maps were generated comparing painful to neutral heat (35 degrees C) and nonpainful brushing to rest. Directed searches were performed in SI and SII for sites reliably activated by noxious heat and brush stimuli, and stimulus-dependent regions of interest (ROI) were then constructed for each subject. The time course, per stimulus cycle, was extracted from these ROIs and compared across subjects, stimulus modalities, and cortical regions. Both innocuous brushing and noxious heat produced significant activation within contralateral SI and SII. The time course of brush-evoked responses revealed a consistent single peak of activity, approximately 10 s after the onset of the stimulus, which rapidly diminished upon stimulus withdrawal. In contrast, the response to heat pain in both SI and SII was characterized by a double-peaked time course in which the maximum response (the 2nd peak) was consistently observed approximately 17 s after the onset of the stimulus (8 s following termination of the stimulus). This prolonged period of activation paralleled the perception of increasing pain intensity that persists even after stimulus offset. On the other hand, the temporal profile of the initial minor peak in pain-related activation closely matched that of the brush-evoked activity, suggesting a possible relationship to tactile components of the thermal stimulation procedure. These data indicate that both SI and SII cortices are involved in the processing of nociceptive information and are consistent with a role for these structures in the perception of temporal aspects of pain intensity.
体感皮层(SI和SII)在疼痛感知中的作用长期以来一直存在争议。人体成像研究表明,SI和SII的激活与疼痛刺激有关,但结果各不相同,而且这种激活的功能相关性尚不确定。本研究通过测试由热痛和非痛性触觉刺激诱发的体感激活的时间进程是否足以区分表征这些刺激模式感知的时间差异来解决这个问题。四名正常受试者每人参加了三次功能磁共振成像(fMRI)实验,在不同的实验中,对左腿反复施加疼痛性(有害热45 - 46摄氏度)和非痛性测试刺激(2赫兹轻刷)(刺激持续时间9秒)。生成激活图,将疼痛热刺激与中性热刺激(35摄氏度)以及非痛性轻刷与静息状态进行比较。在SI和SII中进行定向搜索,寻找由有害热刺激和轻刷刺激可靠激活的部位,然后为每个受试者构建刺激依赖的感兴趣区域(ROI)。从这些ROI中提取每个刺激周期的时间进程,并在受试者、刺激模式和皮层区域之间进行比较。无害轻刷和有害热刺激均在对侧SI和SII内产生显著激活。轻刷诱发反应的时间进程显示出一个一致的单峰活动,大约在刺激开始后10秒出现,在刺激撤除后迅速减弱。相比之下,SI和SII对热痛的反应具有双峰时间进程,其中最大反应(第二个峰)始终在刺激开始后约17秒观察到(刺激终止后8秒)。这种延长的激活期与即使在刺激结束后仍持续增加的疼痛强度感知平行。另一方面,疼痛相关激活中初始小峰的时间特征与轻刷诱发活动的时间特征密切匹配,表明可能与热刺激过程中的触觉成分有关。这些数据表明,SI和SII皮层均参与伤害性信息的处理,并且与这些结构在疼痛强度时间方面感知中的作用一致。