Bosch-Driessen Lotje H, Verbraak Frank D, Suttorp-Schulten Maria S A, van Ruyven Rutger L J, Klok Anne Marie, Hoyng Carel B, Rothova Aniki
Uveitis Centre, F.C. Donders Institute of Ophthalmology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jul;134(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(02)01537-4.
To compare the effects of two treatment regimens, one of which included azithromycin, for the treatment of sight-threatening (near optic disk or fovea) ocular toxoplasmosis.
Prospective, randomized open-labeled multicenter study, masked in part with regard to evaluation.
PARTICIPANTS TOTAL ENROLLMENT: 46 patients with sight-threatening ocular toxoplasmosis; pyrimethamine and azithromycin group: 24 patients; pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine group: 22 patients.
Patients were randomized into two treatment regimens. Group 1 was treated with pyrimethamine and azithromycin complemented with folinic acid and the addition of prednisone from day 3. Group 2 was treated with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine complemented with folinic acid and the addition of prednisone from day 3. Patients used study medications daily for 4 weeks. Ocular and laboratory examinations were performed at least weekly during the observation period. The study was masked in part with regard to evaluation.
An assessment was made of the time to resolution of the intraocular inflammatory activity, the size of the retinochoroidal lesion, and visual acuity before and after the treatment as well as all adverse effects of treatments.
Adverse effects were more frequent in the pyrimethamine/sulfadiazine group (P <.04), and three patients in this group had to discontinue treatment. The time to resolution of inflammatory activity, decrease in size of retinochoroidal lesions, and optimal visual acuity did not differ between the two treatment groups. The number of patients who developed recurrences during the first year after treatment was similar for both groups.
The efficacy of the multidrug regimen with pyrimethamine and azithromycin was similar to the standard treatment with pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine. However, the frequency and severity of adverse effects was significantly lower with a regimen containing pyrimethamine and azithromycin. Multidrug therapy with the combination of pyrimethamine and azithromycin appears to be an acceptable alternative for treatment of sight-threatening ocular toxoplasmosis.
比较两种治疗方案(其中一种包含阿奇霉素)对威胁视力(靠近视盘或黄斑)的眼部弓形虫病的治疗效果。
前瞻性、随机开放标签多中心研究,部分评估过程设盲。
参与者 总入组人数:46 例威胁视力的眼部弓形虫病患者;乙胺嘧啶和阿奇霉素组:24 例患者;乙胺嘧啶和磺胺嘧啶组:22 例患者。
患者被随机分为两种治疗方案。第 1 组接受乙胺嘧啶和阿奇霉素治疗,并补充亚叶酸,从第 3 天起加用泼尼松。第 2 组接受乙胺嘧啶和磺胺嘧啶治疗,并补充亚叶酸,从第 3 天起加用泼尼松。患者每天服用研究药物,持续 4 周。在观察期内至少每周进行一次眼部和实验室检查。该研究部分评估过程设盲。
评估眼内炎症活动消退时间、视网膜脉络膜病变大小、治疗前后视力以及治疗的所有不良反应。
乙胺嘧啶/磺胺嘧啶组的不良反应更频繁(P <.04),该组有 3 例患者不得不停止治疗。两组在炎症活动消退时间、视网膜脉络膜病变大小减小以及最佳视力方面没有差异。两组在治疗后第一年复发的患者数量相似。
乙胺嘧啶和阿奇霉素联合多药治疗方案的疗效与乙胺嘧啶和磺胺嘧啶的标准治疗相似。然而,含乙胺嘧啶和阿奇霉素的治疗方案的不良反应频率和严重程度明显更低。乙胺嘧啶和阿奇霉素联合多药治疗似乎是治疗威胁视力的眼部弓形虫病的一种可接受的替代方案。