Schlesinger Mark
Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. 06520, USA.
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):185-235. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00010.
The political legitimacy and policymaking influence of the medical profession have greatly declined in American society over the past 30 years. Despite speculation about the causes, there has been little empirical research assessing the different explanations. To address this gap, data collected in 1995 are used to compare attitudes of the American public and policy elites toward medical authority. Statistical analyses reveal that (1) elites are more hostile to professional authority than is the public; (2) the sources of declining legitimacy are different for the public than they are for policy elites; and (3) the perceptions that most threaten the legitimacy of the medical profession pertain to doubts about professional competence, physicians' perceived lack of altruism, and limited confidence in the profession's political influence. This article concludes with some speculations about the future of professional authority in American medicine.
在过去30年里,美国社会中医疗行业的政治合法性和政策制定影响力大幅下降。尽管人们对其原因进行了种种猜测,但很少有实证研究对各种不同的解释进行评估。为了填补这一空白,本文使用1995年收集的数据来比较美国公众和政策精英对医疗权威的态度。统计分析表明:(1)精英群体比公众对专业权威更具敌意;(2)公众和政策精英认为导致合法性下降的原因有所不同;(3)最威胁医疗行业合法性的认知涉及对专业能力的怀疑、医生被认为缺乏利他主义以及对该行业政治影响力的信心有限。本文最后对美国医学专业权威的未来进行了一些推测。