McCormick Wayne C, Ohata Cynthia Y, Uomoto Jay, Young Heather M, Graves Amy B, Kukull Walter, Teri Linda, Vitaliano Peter, Mortimer James A, McCurry Susan M, Bowen James D, Larson Eric B
Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Avenue, Mail Stop 359755, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Jun;50(6):1149-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50275.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare attitudes toward the use of long-term care between older Japanese Americans (n = 1,244) and older Caucasian Americans (n = 1,354). When presented with a hypothetical situation in which they have dementia, 39% of older Japanese Americans and 42% of older Caucasians intended to be cared for at home, whereas 53% versus 38%, respectively, intended to use nursing home care (P <.001). If the hypothetical situation was hip fracture, 81% of older Japanese Americans and 72% of older Caucasians intended to be cared for at home, with 13% of both groups intending to use nursing home care (P = NS). The subjects' perceptions of what their families, friends, ministers, and communities would want them to choose differed, with more uncertainty among Caucasians (P <.001). For provision of home care, Japanese Americans were more likely to rely on loved ones than Caucasians, who were more likely to rely on paid providers. Multivariate logistic regression showed ethnicity to be independently related to intention to use nursing home care in the dementia scenario, controlling for demographic variables. Being married lowered the odds of intending to use nursing homes in any situation. We conclude that Caucasian Americans intend to use paid home health care at higher rates than Japanese Americans if they become disabled by dementia. Japanese Americans demonstrated more certainty about the influences of others on their opinions, suggesting a more stable cultural norm in this population, and intended to use more nursing home care in the event of permanent debility (dementia).
本研究的目的是比较日裔美国老年人(n = 1244)和高加索裔美国老年人(n = 1354)对长期护理使用的态度。当面对自己患有痴呆症的假设情景时,39%的日裔美国老年人和42%的高加索裔美国老年人打算在家中接受护理,而分别有53%和38%的人打算使用养老院护理(P <.001)。如果假设情景是髋部骨折,81%的日裔美国老年人和72%的高加索裔美国老年人打算在家中接受护理,两组均有13%的人打算使用养老院护理(P =无显著性差异)。受试者对其家人、朋友、牧师和社区希望他们做出何种选择的看法存在差异,高加索人中有更多的不确定性(P <.001)。在提供家庭护理方面,日裔美国人比高加索人更有可能依赖亲人,而高加索人更有可能依赖付费服务提供者。多因素逻辑回归显示,在控制人口统计学变量的情况下,种族与痴呆症情景下使用养老院护理的意愿独立相关。已婚会降低在任何情况下使用养老院的几率。我们得出结论,如果因痴呆症而致残,高加索裔美国人打算比日裔美国人更频繁地使用付费家庭医疗护理。日裔美国人对他人意见的影响表现出更大的确定性,表明该人群的文化规范更稳定,并且在永久性虚弱(痴呆症)情况下打算更多地使用养老院护理。