Suppr超能文献

门诊查房:循证医学的一个场所

Ambulatory rounds: a venue for evidence-based medicine.

作者信息

Ozuah Philip O, Orbe Jessica, Sharif Iman

机构信息

Residency Program in Social Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):740-1. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200207000-00027.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The format of inpatient morning reports and ward rounds is infrequently applied in ambulatory medical education. Published reports, however, suggest that this format provides for learner-centered, case-based discussions rather than topic-based lectures in the ambulatory setting.(1) We developed an ambulatory morning report with the specific objective of enhancing evidence-based medical inquiry among our pediatrics housestaff.

DESCRIPTION

We developed a pediatric encounter form (PEF) by adapting and modifying an instrument described by Paccione et al.(2) The PEF was to be used by residents to document pertinent information and unanswered questions about patients seen during each ambulatory clinic session. Prompts were provided for documenting the patient's primary complaints, the patient's disposition, and questions that the resident needed answered. The PEF was piloted among a group of residents and faculty. The final version incorporated both resident and faculty input. Each resident was asked to complete a PEF for a maximum of two patients per clinic session. We did not direct residents as to what types of questions to formulate. All completed forms were maintained in a central folder. Next, we instituted a one-hour "Ambulatory Rounds" seminar once a week at lunch-time. During these seminars, faculty selected PEF cases from the previous week for discussion. Residents presented the cases and discussed the reasons behind the formulation of their questions. Faculty facilitated and guided residents toward resources for answering their questions. Faculty also helped residents to reformulate their questions to reflect an evidence-based medicine approach. At the end of each seminar, residents elected to research specific questions and present brief reports at the next seminar. To test the hypothesis that residents will formulate a higher proportion of evidence-based medicine (EBM) questions over time, we collected and analyzed 445 questions asked by 12 residents between July 2000 and August 2001. We categorized questions into EBM and non-EBM questions based on faculty assessment. We performed a trend analysis using chi-square to compare questions from July 2000 (as reference value) with the six-month periods of August 2000 to January 2001 and February to August 2001. By the end of the observation period, the proportion of EBM questions had significantly increased from 13% in July 2000 to 28% in the first six-month period and 59% in the second six-month period (p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

We describe a new application of outpatient morning reports. This format has been very well received. Housestaff gave the ambulatory rounds an average rating of 4.3 (out of 5) on a Likert scale. Our experience suggests that this format not only provides a forum for case-based learning but can be successfully used to enhance the principles of evidence-based medicine among residents.

摘要

目的

住院晨间报告和病房查房的形式在门诊医学教育中很少应用。然而,已发表的报告表明,这种形式在门诊环境中提供了以学习者为中心、基于病例的讨论,而不是基于主题的讲座。(1)我们开发了一种门诊晨间报告,其具体目标是加强我们儿科住院医师基于证据的医学探究。

描述

我们通过改编和修改Paccione等人描述的一种工具,开发了一份儿科会诊表(PEF)。(2)住院医师使用PEF记录每次门诊会诊期间见到的患者的相关信息和未解决的问题。提供了提示,用于记录患者的主要投诉、患者的处置情况以及住院医师需要解答的问题。PEF在一组住院医师和教员中进行了试点。最终版本纳入了住院医师和教员的意见。要求每位住院医师每次门诊会诊最多为两名患者填写一份PEF。我们没有指导住院医师应该提出何种类型的问题。所有填写完整的表格都保存在一个中央文件夹中。接下来,我们每周在午餐时间举办一次为期一小时的“门诊查房”研讨会。在这些研讨会上,教员从前一周的PEF病例中挑选进行讨论。住院医师展示病例并讨论他们提出问题的原因。教员协助并引导住院医师获取回答问题的资源。教员还帮助住院医师重新表述他们的问题,以体现基于证据的医学方法。在每次研讨会结束时,住院医师选择研究特定问题,并在下一次研讨会上提交简短报告。为了检验随着时间推移住院医师会提出更高比例基于证据的医学(EBM)问题这一假设,我们收集并分析了2000年7月至2001年8月期间12名住院医师提出的445个问题。我们根据教员的评估将问题分为EBM问题和非EBM问题。我们使用卡方检验进行趋势分析,以比较2000年7月(作为参考值)与2000年8月至2001年1月以及2001年2月至8月这两个六个月期间的问题。到观察期结束时,EBM问题的比例已从2000年7月的13%显著增加到第一个六个月期间的28%,以及第二个六个月期间的59%(p < 0.001)。

讨论

我们描述了门诊晨间报告的一种新应用。这种形式受到了广泛好评。住院医师对门诊查房在李克特量表上的平均评分为4.3(满分5分)。我们的经验表明,这种形式不仅提供了一个基于病例学习的平台,而且可以成功用于加强住院医师基于证据的医学原则。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验