Atchison Kathryn A, Cheffetz Susan E
UCLA School of Dentistry, CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2002 Jun;66(6):730-8.
Discussion of critical issues facing postgraduate education in general dentistry (PGD) and dental education in general has been intense in the past decade. This study reports on critical issues raised by directors of PGD programs that may help direct future research and action within dental education and the larger profession. The analysis reports responses to an open-ended question sent to all U.S. PGD program directors regarding critical issues facing their training programs. Of 212 surveys, 169 program directors submitted written responses regarding critical issues. Twelve unique themes were identified: lack of postdoctoral applicants (two subthemes were high student debt and students' preference for private practice); student quality; professionalism and attitudes; number of postdoctoral positions; lack of funding; quality of facilities; special patient care; program curriculum; educator issues; mandatory or encouraged PGD year; value of dental program; and dentist shortage. Significant differences between AEGD and GPR directors were observed for two of the twelve areas: high student debt and value of dental program. The study provided insight into the thoughts of a large proportion of the U.S. PGD program directors "in the trenches." Some consideration of allowable expenses may be needed to align federal training support to best address program director needs.
在过去十年中,针对口腔全科研究生教育(PGD)以及总体牙科教育所面临的关键问题展开的讨论十分激烈。本研究报告了PGD项目主任提出的关键问题,这些问题可能有助于指导牙科教育及更广泛专业领域未来的研究与行动。该分析报告了对向所有美国PGD项目主任发送的一个开放式问题的回复,问题涉及他们的培训项目所面临的关键问题。在212份调查问卷中,169位项目主任提交了有关关键问题的书面回复。确定了12个独特的主题:博士后申请者不足(两个子主题是学生高额债务和学生对私人执业的偏好);学生素质;专业精神和态度;博士后职位数量;资金短缺;设施质量;特殊患者护理;项目课程;教育工作者问题;强制性或鼓励性的PGD学年;牙科项目的价值;以及牙医短缺。在这12个领域中的两个方面观察到AEGD和GPR主任之间存在显著差异:学生高额债务和牙科项目的价值。该研究深入了解了美国大部分处于实际工作中的PGD项目主任的想法。可能需要对允许的费用进行一些考虑,以使联邦培训支持与项目主任的需求最佳匹配。