Suppr超能文献

双牙弓印模的准确性:一项初步研究。

The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.

作者信息

Larson Trevor D, Nielsen Mark A, Brackett William W

机构信息

College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, 68583-0750, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):625-7. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.125180.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Dual-arch impression trays often are used for addition silicone final impressions of fixed prosthodontic preparations, but concerns about distortion of the impression are common because such trays lack rigidity.

PURPOSE

This in vitro pilot study was designed to determine the accuracy of addition silicone impressions made with custom trays or made with either passive or stressed dual-arch trays.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Complete crown preparations of a mandibular molar, premolar, and incisor were made on a dentoform. These tooth preparations received flat, parallel indexes on the facial and lingual axial walls for accurate and reproducible positioning of a digital caliper. Gypsum dies were produced with an addition silicone impression material in either custom trays or dual-arch trays seated passively or with induced flexure (3 dies per tray group). The facio-lingual dimensions of the dies were measured with a digital caliper accurate to +/-5 microm and compared to the dimensions of the original preparations. Flexure in the latter group was induced by contact of the tray with a simulated torus, made of resin, in the lingual vestibule of the dentoform. Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test (alpha=.05).

RESULTS

Dies fabricated with either the custom or passive dual-arch tray reproduced the facio-lingual dimensions of the preparations within a -27 to +13 microm range. Dies fabricated with the flexed dual-arch tray exhibited greater discrepancy, in the range of -47 to -67 microm relative to the preparations. Tray type was a significant factor (P=.002): the flexed tray group was significantly different than the other 2 groups, which did not differ from each other.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this pilot study, dual-arch impressions were comparable in accuracy to impressions made with custom trays. Accuracy was reduced, however, when the trays were flexed during closure of the arches.

摘要

问题陈述

双弓印模托盘常用于固定义齿修复体预备的加成型硅橡胶终印模,但由于此类托盘缺乏刚性,对印模变形的担忧很常见。

目的

本体外初步研究旨在确定使用定制托盘或被动或受力双弓托盘制作的加成型硅橡胶印模的准确性。

材料与方法

在一个牙模型上制作下颌磨牙、前磨牙和切牙的全冠预备体。这些牙齿预备体在唇面和舌面轴壁上有平坦、平行的索引,用于数字卡尺的精确和可重复定位。使用加成型硅橡胶印模材料在定制托盘或被动放置或有诱导弯曲的双弓托盘中制作石膏模型(每组托盘制作3个模型)。用精确到±5微米的数字卡尺测量模型的唇舌径,并与原始预备体的尺寸进行比较。后一组的弯曲是通过托盘与牙模型舌侧前庭中由树脂制成的模拟隆突接触来诱导的。数据采用双向方差分析和Tukey多重比较检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

用定制托盘或被动双弓托盘制作的模型在-27至+13微米范围内重现了预备体的唇舌径。用弯曲双弓托盘制作的模型与预备体相比,差异更大,在-47至-67微米范围内。托盘类型是一个显著因素(P = 0.002):弯曲托盘组与其他两组有显著差异,而其他两组之间没有差异。

结论

在本初步研究的局限性内,双弓印模在准确性上与用定制托盘制作的印模相当。然而,当在牙弓闭合过程中托盘发生弯曲时,准确性会降低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验